Cupra Raval vs Nissan Micra

Cupra Raval leads 7 to 1

Biggest differences: Power — Cupra Raval 211 PS, Nissan Micra 150 PS · Boot — Cupra Raval 441 l, Nissan Micra 326 l · 0–100 km/h — Cupra Raval 7.1 s, Nissan Micra 8 s.

Cupra Raval

Cupra Raval is an urban B-segment hatchback, in model year 2026 in three variants: WLTP range from 328 to 444 km, power from 135 to 226 hp.

Nissan Micra

The Nissan Micra (Model Year 2026) is a compact, segment B hatchback available with two different range and power configurations, offering front-wheel drive.

Profile against the market: Cupra Raval vs Nissan Micra

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Cupra Raval or Nissan Micra — who wins where

Cupra Raval leads 7 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmCupra Raval +28 km
    Cupra Raval
    444
    Nissan Micra
    416
  • Battery kWhNo difference
    Cupra Raval
    52
    Nissan Micra
    52
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmCupra Raval −1.1 kWh/100 km
    Cupra Raval
    13.6
    Nissan Micra
    14.7
  • Power PSCupra Raval +61 PS
    Cupra Raval
    211
    Nissan Micra
    150
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sCupra Raval −0.9 s
    Cupra Raval
    7.1
    Nissan Micra
    8
  • Top speed km/hCupra Raval +10 km/h
    Cupra Raval
    160
    Nissan Micra
    150
  • DC charging kWCupra Raval +5 kW
    Cupra Raval
    105
    Nissan Micra
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Cupra Raval
    11
    Nissan Micra
    11
  • Weight ↓ kgNissan Micra −158 kg
    Cupra Raval
    1610
    Nissan Micra
    1452
  • Boot lCupra Raval +115 l
    Cupra Raval
    441
    Nissan Micra
    326

Add a third car

Technical data: Cupra Raval vs Nissan Micra

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Cupra Raval vs Nissan Micra
Key parameters Cupra Raval
52 kWh
Nissan Micra
52 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range444 km416 kmCupra +28 km
Battery52 kWh52 kWhNo difference
Consumption ↓13.6 kWh/100 km14.7 kWh/100 kmCupra −1.1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging105 kW100 kWCupra +5 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging ⚠28 min 10–80%30 min 15–80%2 min
Range per minute of charging11.1 km/min9 km/minCupra +2.1 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power211 PS150 PSCupra +61 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7.1 s8 sCupra −0.9 s
Top speed160 km/h150 km/hCupra +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓1610 kg1452 kgNissan −158 kg
Boot441 l326 lCupra +115 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4046 mm3974 mmCupra +72 mm
Width1784 mm1774 mmCupra +10 mm
Height1514 mm1499 mmCupra +15 mm
Wheelbase2599 mm2541 mmCupra +58 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Cupra Raval

Cost per 100 km4.08
Monthly51
Yearly612

Nissan Micra

Cost per 100 km4.41
Monthly55
Yearly661

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Cupra Raval

Nissan Micra

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Cupra Raval or Nissan Micra?

The Cupra Raval goes further: 444 km WLTP against the 416 km of the Nissan Micra. That is a difference of 28 km.

Which is more powerful — Cupra Raval or Nissan Micra?

The Cupra Raval is stronger: 211 PS against the 150 PS of the Nissan Micra. The gap is 61 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Cupra Raval takes more: 441 l against 326 l in the Nissan Micra. The difference is 115 l.

Which charges faster?

The Cupra Raval accepts up to 105 kW DC, the Nissan Micra up to 100 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.