Cupra Raval vs Nio Firefly

Biggest differences: Power — Cupra Raval 211 PS, Nio Firefly 143 PS · WLTP range — Cupra Raval 444 km, Nio Firefly 330 km · Battery — Cupra Raval 52 kWh, Nio Firefly 42.1 kWh.

Cupra Raval

The Cupra Raval is an all-electric hatchback in the B segment, offered in three different powertrain configurations, each with varying power output and range.

Nio Firefly

The Nio Firefly is a compact hatchback with rear-wheel drive, offering a range of 330 km in the WLTP cycle.

Profile against the market: Cupra Raval vs Nio Firefly

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Cupra Raval or Nio Firefly — who wins where

Cupra Raval leads 9 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmCupra Raval +114 km
    Cupra Raval
    444
    Nio Firefly
    330
  • Battery kWhCupra Raval +9.9 kWh
    Cupra Raval
    52
    Nio Firefly
    42.1
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmCupra Raval −0.9 kWh/100 km
    Cupra Raval
    13.6
    Nio Firefly
    14.5
  • Power PSCupra Raval +68 PS
    Cupra Raval
    211
    Nio Firefly
    143
  • 0–100 km/h sCupra Raval −1 s
    Cupra Raval
    7.1
    Nio Firefly
    8.1
  • Top speed km/hCupra Raval +10 km/h
    Cupra Raval
    160
    Nio Firefly
    150
  • DC charging kWCupra Raval +5 kW
    Cupra Raval
    105
    Nio Firefly
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Cupra Raval
    11
    Nio Firefly
    11
  • Charging minCupra Raval −1 min
    Cupra Raval
    28
    Nio Firefly
    29
  • Weight kgNio Firefly −143 kg
    Cupra Raval
    1610
    Nio Firefly
    1467
  • Boot lCupra Raval +37 l
    Cupra Raval
    441
    Nio Firefly
    404

Add a third car

Technical data: Cupra Raval vs Nio Firefly

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Cupra Raval vs Nio Firefly
Key parameters Cupra Raval
52 kWh
Nio Firefly
42.1 kWh RWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range444 km330 kmCupra +114 km
Battery52 kWh42.1 kWhCupra +9.9 kWh
Consumption13.6 kWh/100 km14.5 kWh/100 kmCupra −0.9 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging105 kW100 kWCupra +5 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%28 min29 minCupra −1 min
Range per minute of charging11.1 km/min8 km/minCupra +3.1 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power211 PS143 PSCupra +68 PS
0–100 km/h7.1 s8.1 sCupra −1 s
Top speed160 km/h150 km/hCupra +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1610 kg1467 kgNio −143 kg
Boot441 l404 lCupra +37 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4046 mm4003 mmCupra +43 mm
Width1784 mm1885 mmNio +101 mm
Height1514 mm1557 mmNio +43 mm
Wheelbase2599 mm2615 mmNio +16 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Cupra Raval

Cost per 100 km4.08
Monthly51
Yearly612

Nio Firefly

Cost per 100 km4.35
Monthly54
Yearly652

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Cupra Raval

Nio Firefly

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Cupra Raval or Nio Firefly?

The Cupra Raval goes further: 444 km WLTP against the 330 km of the Nio Firefly. That is a difference of 114 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Cupra Raval and the Nio Firefly differ?

The Cupra Raval has FWD and 211 PS. The Nio Firefly has RWD and 143 PS.

Which is more powerful — Cupra Raval or Nio Firefly?

The Cupra Raval is stronger: 211 PS against the 143 PS of the Nio Firefly. The gap is 68 PS.

Which charges faster?

The Cupra Raval accepts up to 105 kW DC, the Nio Firefly up to 100 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 29 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.