Cupra Raval vs JAC E30X

Biggest differences: DC charging — Cupra Raval 105 kW, JAC E30X 64 kW · Power — Cupra Raval 211 PS, JAC E30X 136 PS · Boot — Cupra Raval 441 l, JAC E30X 310 l.

Cupra Raval

The Cupra Raval is an all-electric hatchback in the B segment, offered in three different powertrain configurations, each with varying power output and range.

JAC E30X

The JAC E30X is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offering two battery options and corresponding ranges, all with the same powertrain output.

Profile against the market: Cupra Raval vs JAC E30X

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Cupra Raval or JAC E30X — who wins where

Cupra Raval leads 8 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmCupra Raval +70 km
    Cupra Raval
    444
    JAC E30X
    374
  • Battery kWhCupra Raval +0.5 kWh
    Cupra Raval
    52
    JAC E30X
    51.5
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmCupra Raval −2 kWh/100 km
    Cupra Raval
    13.6
    JAC E30X
    15.6
  • Power PSCupra Raval +75 PS
    Cupra Raval
    211
    JAC E30X
    136
  • 0–100 km/h sCupra Raval −0.7 s
    Cupra Raval
    7.1
    JAC E30X
    7.8
  • Top speed km/hCupra Raval +10 km/h
    Cupra Raval
    160
    JAC E30X
    150
  • DC charging kWCupra Raval +41 kW
    Cupra Raval
    105
    JAC E30X
    64
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Cupra Raval
    11
    JAC E30X
    11
  • Weight kgJAC E30X −165 kg
    Cupra Raval
    1610
    JAC E30X
    1445
  • Boot lCupra Raval +131 l
    Cupra Raval
    441
    JAC E30X
    310

Add a third car

Technical data: Cupra Raval vs JAC E30X

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Cupra Raval vs JAC E30X
Key parameters Cupra Raval
52 kWh
JAC E30X
Nordic Edition 50
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range444 km374 kmCupra +70 km
Battery52 kWh51.5 kWhCupra +0.5 kWh
Consumption13.6 kWh/100 km15.6 kWh/100 kmCupra −2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging105 kW64 kWCupra +41 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 28 min 10–80%45 min 30–80%17 min
Range per minute of charging11.1 km/min4.2 km/minCupra +6.9 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power211 PS136 PSCupra +75 PS
0–100 km/h7.1 s7.8 sCupra −0.7 s
Top speed160 km/h150 km/hCupra +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1610 kg1445 kgJAC −165 kg
Boot441 l310 lCupra +131 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Cupra
Length4046 mm4025 mmCupra +21 mm
Width1784 mm1770 mmCupra +14 mm
Height1514 mm1560 mmJAC +46 mm
Wheelbase2599 mm2620 mmJAC +21 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Cupra Raval

Cost per 100 km4.08
Monthly51
Yearly612

JAC E30X

Cost per 100 km4.68
Monthly59
Yearly702

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Cupra Raval

JAC E30X

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Cupra Raval or JAC E30X?

The Cupra Raval goes further: 444 km WLTP against the 374 km of the JAC E30X. That is a difference of 70 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Cupra Raval — its 52 kWh battery then works as a power source. The JAC E30X, with 51.5 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Cupra Raval or JAC E30X?

The Cupra Raval is stronger: 211 PS against the 136 PS of the JAC E30X. The gap is 75 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Cupra Raval takes more: 441 l against 310 l in the JAC E30X. The difference is 131 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.