Changan Deepal S05 vs Volvo EX40
Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — Changan Deepal S05 23 min, Volvo EX40 28 min · Boot — Changan Deepal S05 492 l, Volvo EX40 410 l · Battery — Changan Deepal S05 68.8 kWh, Volvo EX40 82 kWh.
Changan Deepal S05
The Changan Deepal S05 is a C-segment SUV offering two powertrain options, with power ranging from 272 horsepower to 435 horsepower.
Volvo EX40
The Volvo EX40 is a compact crossover available in four different powertrain options, offering a range of up to 574 kilometers and accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in just 4.6 seconds.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S05 vs Volvo EX40
- Changan Deepal S05RWD Max
Volvo EX40Single Motor Extended Range
Changan Deepal S05 or Volvo EX40 — who wins where
Changan Deepal S05 leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EX40 +86 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX40 +13.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmChangan Deepal S05 −0.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSChangan Deepal S05 +20 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX40 −0.2 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWVolvo EX40 +32 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minChangan Deepal S05 −5 min
- Weight ↓ kgChangan Deepal S05 −60 kg
- Boot lChangan Deepal S05 +82 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S05 vs Volvo EX40
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S05 RWD Max | Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 488 km | 574 km | Volvo +86 km |
| Battery | 68.8 kWh | 82 kWh | Volvo +13.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 16.6 kWh/100 km | Changan −0.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 168 kW | 200 kW | Volvo +32 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 23 min | 28 min | Changan −5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.9 km/min | 14.3 km/min | Changan +0.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 272 PS | 252 PS | Changan +20 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.5 s | 7.3 s | Volvo −0.2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1940 kg | 2000 kg | Changan −60 kg |
| Boot | 492 l | 410 l | Changan +82 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Changan |
| Length | 4598 mm | 4440 mm | Changan +158 mm |
| Width | 1900 mm | 1873 mm | Changan +27 mm |
| Height | 1600 mm | 1647 mm | Volvo +47 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2880 mm | 2702 mm | Changan +178 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S05
Volvo EX40
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S05
Volvo EX40
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S05 or Volvo EX40?
The Volvo EX40 goes further: 574 km WLTP against the 488 km of the Changan Deepal S05. That is a difference of 86 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Changan Deepal S05 — its 68.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Volvo EX40, with 82 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Changan Deepal S05 takes more: 492 l against 410 l in the Volvo EX40. The difference is 82 l.
Which charges faster?
The Changan Deepal S05 accepts up to 168 kW DC, the Volvo EX40 up to 200 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 23 and 28 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.