Changan Deepal S05 vs Lynk & Co 02
Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — Changan Deepal S05 7.5 s, Lynk & Co 02 5.5 s · Charging 10–80% — Changan Deepal S05 23 min, Lynk & Co 02 30 min · Boot — Changan Deepal S05 492 l, Lynk & Co 02 410 l.
Changan Deepal S05
The Changan Deepal S05 is a C-segment SUV offering two powertrain options, with power ranging from 272 horsepower to 435 horsepower.
Lynk & Co 02
The Lynk & Co 02 Long Range (Model Year 2025) is a compact SUV with rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 445 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S05 vs Lynk & Co 02
- Changan Deepal S05RWD Max
Lynk & Co 02Long Range
Changan Deepal S05 or Lynk & Co 02 — who wins where
Changan Deepal S05 leads 6 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmChangan Deepal S05 +43 km
- Battery kWhChangan Deepal S05 +2.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmChangan Deepal S05 −1.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sLynk & Co 02 −2 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWChangan Deepal S05 +18 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minChangan Deepal S05 −7 min
- Weight ↓ kgLynk & Co 02 −120 kg
- Boot lChangan Deepal S05 +82 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S05 vs Lynk & Co 02
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S05 RWD Max | Lynk & Co 02 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 488 km | 445 km | Changan +43 km |
| Battery | 68.8 kWh | 66 kWh | Changan +2.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 17.1 kWh/100 km | Changan −1.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 168 kW | 150 kW | Changan +18 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 23 min | 30 min | Changan −7 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.9 km/min | 10.4 km/min | Changan +4.5 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 272 PS | 272 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.5 s | 5.5 s | Lynk & Co −2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1940 kg | 1820 kg | Lynk & Co −120 kg |
| Boot | 492 l | 410 l | Changan +82 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4598 mm | 4460 mm | Changan +138 mm |
| Width | 1900 mm | 1845 mm | Changan +55 mm |
| Height | 1600 mm | 1573 mm | Changan +27 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2880 mm | 2755 mm | Changan +125 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S05
Lynk & Co 02
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S05
Lynk & Co 02
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S05 or Lynk & Co 02?
The Changan Deepal S05 goes further: 488 km WLTP against the 445 km of the Lynk & Co 02. That is a difference of 43 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Changan Deepal S05 takes more: 492 l against 410 l in the Lynk & Co 02. The difference is 82 l.
Which charges faster?
The Changan Deepal S05 accepts up to 168 kW DC, the Lynk & Co 02 up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 23 and 30 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Changan Deepal S05 uses less electricity: 15.9 kWh/100 km against 17.1 kWh/100 km in the Lynk & Co 02. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 180 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.