Changan Deepal S05 vs Leapmotor B10
Biggest differences: DC charging — Changan Deepal S05 168 kW, Leapmotor B10 100 kW · Power — Changan Deepal S05 272 PS, Leapmotor B10 218 PS · Boot — Changan Deepal S05 492 l, Leapmotor B10 430 l.
Changan Deepal S05
The Changan Deepal S05 is a C-segment SUV offering two powertrain options, with power ranging from 272 horsepower to 435 horsepower.
Leapmotor B10
The Leapmotor B10 is a compact SUV with rear-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of up to 434 kilometers in the Long Range version.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S05 vs Leapmotor B10
- Changan Deepal S05RWD Max
Leapmotor B10Long Range
Changan Deepal S05 or Leapmotor B10 — who wins where
Changan Deepal S05 leads 8 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmChangan Deepal S05 +54 km
- Battery kWhChangan Deepal S05 +1.7 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmChangan Deepal S05 −1.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSChangan Deepal S05 +54 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sChangan Deepal S05 −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hChangan Deepal S05 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWChangan Deepal S05 +68 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgLeapmotor B10 −95 kg
- Boot lChangan Deepal S05 +62 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S05 vs Leapmotor B10
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S05 RWD Max | Leapmotor B10Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 488 km | 434 km | Changan +54 km |
| Battery | 68.8 kWh | 67.1 kWh | Changan +1.7 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 17.3 kWh/100 km | Changan −1.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 168 kW | 100 kW | Changan +68 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 23 min 10–80% | 20 min 30–80% | 3 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.9 km/min | 10.9 km/min | Changan +4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 272 PS | 218 PS | Changan +54 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.5 s | 8 s | Changan −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h | Changan +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1940 kg | 1845 kg | Leapmotor −95 kg |
| Boot | 492 l | 430 l | Changan +62 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4598 mm | 4515 mm | Changan +83 mm |
| Width | 1900 mm | 1885 mm | Changan +15 mm |
| Height | 1600 mm | 1655 mm | Leapmotor +55 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2880 mm | 2735 mm | Changan +145 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S05
Leapmotor B10
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S05
Leapmotor B10
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S05 or Leapmotor B10?
The Changan Deepal S05 goes further: 488 km WLTP against the 434 km of the Leapmotor B10. That is a difference of 54 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Changan Deepal S05 takes more: 492 l against 430 l in the Leapmotor B10. The difference is 62 l.
Which charges faster?
The Changan Deepal S05 accepts up to 168 kW DC, the Leapmotor B10 up to 100 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Changan Deepal S05 uses less electricity: 15.9 kWh/100 km against 17.3 kWh/100 km in the Leapmotor B10. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 210 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.




