Cadillac Lyriq vs Mercedes G 580
Biggest differences: Consumption — Cadillac Lyriq 22.5 kWh/100 km, Mercedes G 580 27.9 kWh/100 km · Top speed — Cadillac Lyriq 210 km/h, Mercedes G 580 180 km/h · Battery — Cadillac Lyriq 102 kWh, Mercedes G 580 117 kWh.
Cadillac Lyriq
The Cadillac Lyriq is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering two versions of all-wheel drive (AWD) with different power outputs and ranges.
Mercedes G 580
An all-electric SUV in the E segment, featuring a large battery capacity, fast DC charging capabilities, and all-wheel drive.
Profile against the market: Cadillac Lyriq vs Mercedes G 580
Cadillac Lyriq or Mercedes G 580 — who wins where
It's a tie: 5 to 5
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmCadillac Lyriq +51 km
- Battery kWhMercedes G 580 +15 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmCadillac Lyriq −5.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMercedes G 580 +59 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMercedes G 580 −0.6 s
- Top speed km/hCadillac Lyriq +30 km/h
- DC charging kWMercedes G 580 +20 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minMercedes G 580 −1 min
- Weight ↓ kgCadillac Lyriq −330 kg
- Boot lCadillac Lyriq +33 l
Technical data: Cadillac Lyriq vs Mercedes G 580
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  Cadillac LyriqAWD |  Mercedes G 580EQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 530 km | 479 km | Cadillac +51 km |
| Battery | 102 kWh | 117 kWh | Mercedes +15 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 22.5 kWh/100 km | 27.9 kWh/100 km | Cadillac −5.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 190 kW | 210 kW | Mercedes +20 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 30 min | 29 min | Mercedes −1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12.4 km/min | 11.6 km/min | Cadillac +0.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 528 PS | 587 PS | Mercedes +59 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 5.3 s | 4.7 s | Mercedes −0.6 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | Cadillac +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2680 kg | 3010 kg | Cadillac −330 kg |
| Boot | 588 l | 555 l | Cadillac +33 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Cadillac |
| Length | 4996 mm | 4624 mm | Cadillac +372 mm |
| Width | 1977 mm | 1931 mm | Cadillac +46 mm |
| Height | 1623 mm | 1986 mm | Mercedes +363 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3094 mm | 2890 mm | Cadillac +204 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Cadillac Lyriq
Mercedes G 580
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Cadillac Lyriq
Mercedes G 580
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Cadillac Lyriq or Mercedes G 580?
The Cadillac Lyriq goes further: 530 km WLTP against the 479 km of the Mercedes G 580. That is a difference of 51 km.
Why does the Mercedes G 580 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Cadillac Lyriq?
The Mercedes G 580 carries 117 kWh and covers 479 km, while the Cadillac Lyriq with its 102 kWh battery does 530 km. Energy use decides it: 27.9 against 22.5 kWh/100 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Cadillac Lyriq — its 102 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes G 580, with 117 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Cadillac Lyriq accepts up to 190 kW DC, the Mercedes G 580 up to 210 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 30 and 29 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.