Mercedes G 580 vs Xpeng G9L
Xpeng G9L leads 7 to 3
Biggest differences: DC charging — Mercedes G 580 210 kW, Xpeng G9L 540 kW · Charging 10–80% — Mercedes G 580 29 min, Xpeng G9L 12 min · Boot — Mercedes G 580 555 l, Xpeng G9L 935 l.
Mercedes G 580
An all-electric SUV in the E segment, featuring a large battery capacity, fast DC charging capabilities, and all-wheel drive.
Xpeng G9L
The Xpeng G9L is a seven-seat E-segment SUV: a 110 kWh battery, a WLTP range of up to 591 km and 540 kW DC charging.
Profile against the market: Mercedes G 580 vs Xpeng G9L
Mercedes G 580EQ
Xpeng G9LRWD Long Range
Mercedes G 580 or Xpeng G9L — who wins where
Xpeng G9L leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmXpeng G9L +112 km
- Battery kWhMercedes G 580 +7 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmXpeng G9L −6.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMercedes G 580 +220 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMercedes G 580 −2.3 s
- Top speed km/hXpeng G9L +20 km/h
- DC charging kWXpeng G9L +330 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minXpeng G9L −17 min
- Weight ↓ kgXpeng G9L −310 kg
- Boot lXpeng G9L +380 l
Technical data: Mercedes G 580 vs Xpeng G9L
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Mercedes G 580 EQ | Xpeng G9L RWD Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 479 km | 591 km | Xpeng +112 km |
| Battery | 117 kWh | 110 kWh | Mercedes +7 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 27.9 kWh/100 km | 21.1 kWh/100 km | Xpeng −6.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 210 kW | 540 kW | Xpeng +330 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 29 min | 12 min | Xpeng −17 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 11.6 km/min | 34.5 km/min | Xpeng +22.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Xpeng +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 587 PS | 367 PS | Mercedes +220 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.7 s | 7 s | Mercedes −2.3 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 200 km/h | Xpeng +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 3010 kg | 2700 kg | Xpeng −310 kg |
| Boot | 555 l | 935 l | Xpeng +380 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Xpeng |
| Length | 4624 mm | 5120 mm | Xpeng +496 mm |
| Width | 1931 mm | 1999 mm | Xpeng +68 mm |
| Height | 1986 mm | 1788 mm | Mercedes +198 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2890 mm | 3100 mm | Xpeng +210 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mercedes G 580
Xpeng G9L
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mercedes G 580
Xpeng G9L
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Mercedes G 580 or Xpeng G9L?
The Xpeng G9L goes further: 591 km WLTP against the 479 km of the Mercedes G 580. That is a difference of 112 km.
Why does the Mercedes G 580 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Xpeng G9L?
The Mercedes G 580 carries 117 kWh and covers 479 km, while the Xpeng G9L with its 110 kWh battery does 591 km. Energy use decides it: 27.9 against 21.1 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Mercedes G 580 and the Xpeng G9L differ?
The Mercedes G 580 has AWD and 587 PS. The Xpeng G9L has RWD and 367 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Xpeng G9L — its 110 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes G 580, with 117 kWh, does not offer it.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.