BYD Atto 8 vs Volvo EX90
BYD Atto 8 leads 4 to 1
Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — BYD Atto 8 8 s, Volvo EX90 5.5 s · Consumption — BYD Atto 8 17.6 kWh/100 km, Volvo EX90 19.4 kWh/100 km · Battery — BYD Atto 8 115 kWh, Volvo EX90 106 kWh.
BYD Atto 8
The BYD Atto 8 is a seven-seater electric SUV in the E segment with a 115 kWh battery, offering a WLTP range of between 602 and 653 km and a power output ranging from 462 to 775 horsepower.
Volvo EX90
The Volvo EX90 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering three powertrain options with power ranging from 333 horsepower to 680 horsepower.
Profile against the market: BYD Atto 8 vs Volvo EX90
BYD Atto 8Design
Volvo EX90Twin Motor
BYD Atto 8 or Volvo EX90 — who wins where
BYD Atto 8 leads 4 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmBYD Atto 8 +28 km
- Battery kWhBYD Atto 8 +9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBYD Atto 8 −1.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBYD Atto 8 +6 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX90 −2.5 s
- Top speed km/hNo data
- DC charging kWNo data
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: BYD Atto 8 vs Volvo EX90
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BYD Atto 8 Design | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 653 km | 625 km | BYD +28 km |
| Battery | 115 kWh | 106 kWh | BYD +9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.6 kWh/100 km | 19.4 kWh/100 km | BYD −1.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | — | 350 kW | — |
| AC charging | — | 11 kW | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 22 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 19.9 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 800 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 462 PS | 456 PS | BYD +6 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8 s | 5.5 s | Volvo −2.5 s |
| Top speed | — | 180 km/h | — |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 2690 kg | — |
| Boot | — | 324 l | — |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Volvo |
| Length | 5040 mm | 5037 mm | BYD +3 mm |
| Width | 1996 mm | 1964 mm | BYD +32 mm |
| Height | 1760 mm | 1744 mm | BYD +16 mm |
| Wheelbase | — | 2985 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BYD Atto 8
Volvo EX90
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
BYD Atto 8
Volvo EX90
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BYD Atto 8 or Volvo EX90?
The BYD Atto 8 goes further: 653 km WLTP against the 625 km of the Volvo EX90. That is a difference of 28 km.
How do the drivetrains of the BYD Atto 8 and the Volvo EX90 differ?
The BYD Atto 8 has RWD and 462 PS. The Volvo EX90 has AWD and 456 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Volvo EX90 — its 106 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BYD Atto 8, with 115 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is cheaper to run?
The BYD Atto 8 uses less electricity: 17.6 kWh/100 km against 19.4 kWh/100 km in the Volvo EX90. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 270 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.