BYD Atto 8 vs Xpeng G9L
BYD Atto 8 leads 4 to 1
Biggest differences: Power — BYD Atto 8 462 PS, Xpeng G9L 367 PS · Consumption — BYD Atto 8 17.6 kWh/100 km, Xpeng G9L 21.1 kWh/100 km · 0–100 km/h — BYD Atto 8 8 s, Xpeng G9L 7 s.
BYD Atto 8
The BYD Atto 8 is a seven-seater electric SUV in the E segment with a 115 kWh battery, offering a WLTP range of between 602 and 653 km and a power output ranging from 462 to 775 horsepower.
Xpeng G9L
The Xpeng G9L is a seven-seat E-segment SUV: a 110 kWh battery, a WLTP range of up to 591 km and 540 kW DC charging.
Profile against the market: BYD Atto 8 vs Xpeng G9L
BYD Atto 8Design
Xpeng G9LRWD Long Range
BYD Atto 8 or Xpeng G9L — who wins where
BYD Atto 8 leads 4 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmBYD Atto 8 +62 km
- Battery kWhBYD Atto 8 +5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBYD Atto 8 −3.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBYD Atto 8 +95 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sXpeng G9L −1 s
- Top speed km/hNo data
- DC charging kWNo data
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: BYD Atto 8 vs Xpeng G9L
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BYD Atto 8 Design | Xpeng G9L RWD Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 653 km | 591 km | BYD +62 km |
| Battery | 115 kWh | 110 kWh | BYD +5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.6 kWh/100 km | 21.1 kWh/100 km | BYD −3.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | — | 540 kW | — |
| AC charging | — | 11 kW | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 12 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 34.5 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 800 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 462 PS | 367 PS | BYD +95 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8 s | 7 s | Xpeng −1 s |
| Top speed | — | 200 km/h | — |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 2700 kg | — |
| Boot | — | 935 l | — |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Xpeng |
| Length | 5040 mm | 5120 mm | Xpeng +80 mm |
| Width | 1996 mm | 1999 mm | Xpeng +3 mm |
| Height | 1760 mm | 1788 mm | Xpeng +28 mm |
| Wheelbase | — | 3100 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BYD Atto 8
Xpeng G9L
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
BYD Atto 8
Xpeng G9L
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BYD Atto 8 or Xpeng G9L?
The BYD Atto 8 goes further: 653 km WLTP against the 591 km of the Xpeng G9L. That is a difference of 62 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Xpeng G9L — its 110 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BYD Atto 8, with 115 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is cheaper to run?
The BYD Atto 8 uses less electricity: 17.6 kWh/100 km against 21.1 kWh/100 km in the Xpeng G9L. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 525 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.