BYD Atto 8 vs BYD Tang
BYD Atto 8 leads 3 to 2
Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — BYD Atto 8 8 s, BYD Tang 4.9 s · Consumption — BYD Atto 8 17.6 kWh/100 km, BYD Tang 24 kWh/100 km · WLTP range — BYD Atto 8 653 km, BYD Tang 530 km.
BYD Atto 8
The BYD Atto 8 is a seven-seater electric SUV in the E segment with a 115 kWh battery, offering a WLTP range of between 602 and 653 km and a power output ranging from 462 to 775 horsepower.
BYD Tang
An electric SUV in the E-segment, featuring a powerful engine.
Profile against the market: BYD Atto 8 vs BYD Tang
BYD Atto 8Design
BYD TangFlagship
BYD Atto 8 or BYD Tang — who wins where
BYD Atto 8 leads 3 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmBYD Atto 8 +123 km
- Battery kWhBYD Atto 8 +6.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBYD Atto 8 −6.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBYD Tang +55 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sBYD Tang −3.1 s
- Top speed km/hNo data
- DC charging kWNo data
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: BYD Atto 8 vs BYD Tang
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BYD Atto 8Design | BYD TangFlagship | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 653 km | 530 km | BYD +123 km |
| Battery | 115 kWh | 108.8 kWh | BYD +6.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.6 kWh/100 km | 24 kWh/100 km | BYD −6.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | — | 170 kW | — |
| AC charging | — | 11 kW | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 46 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 8.1 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 462 PS | 517 PS | BYD +55 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8 s | 4.9 s | BYD −3.1 s |
| Top speed | — | 190 km/h | — |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 2630 kg | — |
| Boot | — | 235 l | — |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only BYD |
| Length | 5040 mm | 4970 mm | BYD +70 mm |
| Width | 1996 mm | 1955 mm | BYD +41 mm |
| Height | 1760 mm | 1745 mm | BYD +15 mm |
| Wheelbase | — | 2820 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BYD Atto 8
BYD Tang
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
BYD Atto 8
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BYD Atto 8 or BYD Tang?
The BYD Atto 8 goes further: 653 km WLTP against the 530 km of the BYD Tang. That is a difference of 123 km.
How do the drivetrains of the BYD Atto 8 and the BYD Tang differ?
The BYD Atto 8 has RWD and 462 PS. The BYD Tang has AWD and 517 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the BYD Tang — its 108.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BYD Atto 8, with 115 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is cheaper to run?
The BYD Atto 8 uses less electricity: 17.6 kWh/100 km against 24 kWh/100 km in the BYD Tang. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 960 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.




