BYD Atto 8 vs BYD Tang

BYD Atto 8 leads 3 to 2

Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — BYD Atto 8 8 s, BYD Tang 4.9 s · Consumption — BYD Atto 8 17.6 kWh/100 km, BYD Tang 24 kWh/100 km · WLTP range — BYD Atto 8 653 km, BYD Tang 530 km.

BYD Atto 8

The BYD Atto 8 is a seven-seater electric SUV in the E segment with a 115 kWh battery, offering a WLTP range of between 602 and 653 km and a power output ranging from 462 to 775 horsepower.

BYD Tang

An electric SUV in the E-segment, featuring a powerful engine.

Profile against the market: BYD Atto 8 vs BYD Tang

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BYD Atto 8 or BYD Tang — who wins where

BYD Atto 8 leads 3 to 2

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBYD Atto 8 +123 km
    BYD Atto 8
    653
    BYD Tang
    530
  • Battery kWhBYD Atto 8 +6.2 kWh
    BYD Atto 8
    115
    BYD Tang
    108.8
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBYD Atto 8 −6.4 kWh/100 km
    BYD Atto 8
    17.6
    BYD Tang
    24
  • Power PSBYD Tang +55 PS
    BYD Atto 8
    462
    BYD Tang
    517
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sBYD Tang −3.1 s
    BYD Atto 8
    8
    BYD Tang
    4.9
  • Top speed km/hNo data
    BYD Atto 8
    —
    BYD Tang
    190
  • DC charging kWNo data
    BYD Atto 8
    —
    BYD Tang
    170
  • AC charging kWNo data
    BYD Atto 8
    —
    BYD Tang
    11
  • Charging ↓ minNo data
    BYD Atto 8
    —
    BYD Tang
    46
  • Weight ↓ kgNo data
    BYD Atto 8
    —
    BYD Tang
    2630
  • Boot lNo data
    BYD Atto 8
    —
    BYD Tang
    235

Add a third car

Technical data: BYD Atto 8 vs BYD Tang

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BYD Atto 8 vs BYD Tang
Key parameters BYD Atto 8
Design
BYD Tang
Flagship
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range653 km530 kmBYD +123 km
Battery115 kWh108.8 kWhBYD +6.2 kWh
Consumption ↓17.6 kWh/100 km24 kWh/100 kmBYD −6.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging—170 kW—
AC charging—11 kW—
Charging 10–80% ↓—46 min—
Range per minute of charging—8.1 km/min—
Voltage—400 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power462 PS517 PSBYD +55 PS
0–100 km/h ↓8 s4.9 sBYD −3.1 s
Top speed—190 km/h—
DrivetrainRWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓—2630 kg—
Boot—235 l—
V2L (external power)NoYesonly BYD
Length5040 mm4970 mmBYD +70 mm
Width1996 mm1955 mmBYD +41 mm
Height1760 mm1745 mmBYD +15 mm
Wheelbase—2820 mm—

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BYD Atto 8

Cost per 100 km5.28
Monthly66
Yearly792

BYD Tang

Cost per 100 km7.2
Monthly90
Yearly1080

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BYD Atto 8

BYD Tang

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BYD Atto 8 or BYD Tang?

The BYD Atto 8 goes further: 653 km WLTP against the 530 km of the BYD Tang. That is a difference of 123 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BYD Atto 8 and the BYD Tang differ?

The BYD Atto 8 has RWD and 462 PS. The BYD Tang has AWD and 517 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the BYD Tang — its 108.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BYD Atto 8, with 115 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is cheaper to run?

The BYD Atto 8 uses less electricity: 17.6 kWh/100 km against 24 kWh/100 km in the BYD Tang. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 960 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.