BYD Atto 2 vs Smart #1

Biggest differences: AC charging — BYD Atto 2 11 kW, Smart #1 22 kW · Power — BYD Atto 2 204 PS, Smart #1 272 PS · Charging 10–80% — BYD Atto 2 25 min, Smart #1 30 min.

BYD Atto 2

This electric SUV, belonging to the C-segment, offers two different powertrain options with varying battery capacities and maximum power outputs.

Smart #1

The Smart #1 is an electric SUV in the C segment, offering three different motor configurations and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: BYD Atto 2 vs Smart #1

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BYD Atto 2 or Smart #1 — who wins where

Smart #1 leads 7 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmSmart #1 +10 km
    BYD Atto 2
    430
    Smart #1
    440
  • Battery kWhSmart #1 +1.2 kWh
    BYD Atto 2
    64.8
    Smart #1
    66
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmSmart #1 −1 kWh/100 km
    BYD Atto 2
    17.4
    Smart #1
    16.4
  • Power PSSmart #1 +68 PS
    BYD Atto 2
    204
    Smart #1
    272
  • 0–100 km/h sSmart #1 −1.2 s
    BYD Atto 2
    7.9
    Smart #1
    6.7
  • Top speed km/hSmart #1 +20 km/h
    BYD Atto 2
    160
    Smart #1
    180
  • DC charging kWBYD Atto 2 +5 kW
    BYD Atto 2
    155
    Smart #1
    150
  • AC charging kWSmart #1 +11 kW
    BYD Atto 2
    11
    Smart #1
    22
  • Charging minBYD Atto 2 −5 min
    BYD Atto 2
    25
    Smart #1
    30
  • Weight kgBYD Atto 2 −100 kg
    BYD Atto 2
    1720
    Smart #1
    1820
  • Boot lBYD Atto 2 +39 l
    BYD Atto 2
    450
    Smart #1
    411

Add a third car

Technical data: BYD Atto 2 vs Smart #1

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BYD Atto 2 vs Smart #1
Key parameters BYD Atto 2
Comfort
Smart #1
Pro+
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range430 km440 kmSmart +10 km
Battery64.8 kWh66 kWhSmart +1.2 kWh
Consumption17.4 kWh/100 km16.4 kWh/100 kmSmart −1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging155 kW150 kWBYD +5 kW
AC charging11 kW22 kWSmart +11 kW
Charging 10–80%25 min30 minBYD −5 min
Range per minute of charging12 km/min10.3 km/minBYD +1.7 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS272 PSSmart +68 PS
0–100 km/h7.9 s6.7 sSmart −1.2 s
Top speed160 km/h180 km/hSmart +20 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1720 kg1820 kgBYD −100 kg
Boot450 l411 lBYD +39 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4310 mm4270 mmBYD +40 mm
Width1830 mm1822 mmBYD +8 mm
Height1675 mm1636 mmBYD +39 mm
Wheelbase2620 mm2750 mmSmart +130 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BYD Atto 2

Cost per 100 km5.22
Monthly65
Yearly783

Smart #1

Cost per 100 km4.92
Monthly61
Yearly738

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BYD Atto 2

Smart #1

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BYD Atto 2 or Smart #1?

The Smart #1 goes further: 440 km WLTP against the 430 km of the BYD Atto 2. That is a difference of 10 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BYD Atto 2 and the Smart #1 differ?

The BYD Atto 2 has FWD and 204 PS. The Smart #1 has RWD and 272 PS.

Which is more powerful — BYD Atto 2 or Smart #1?

The Smart #1 is stronger: 272 PS against the 204 PS of the BYD Atto 2. The gap is 68 PS.

Which charges faster?

The BYD Atto 2 accepts up to 155 kW DC, the Smart #1 up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 25 and 30 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.