BYD Atto 2 vs Changan Deepal S05
Biggest differences: Power — BYD Atto 2 204 PS, Changan Deepal S05 272 PS · WLTP range — BYD Atto 2 430 km, Changan Deepal S05 488 km · Weight — BYD Atto 2 1720 kg, Changan Deepal S05 1940 kg.
BYD Atto 2
This electric SUV, belonging to the C-segment, offers two different powertrain options with varying battery capacities and maximum power outputs.
Changan Deepal S05
The Changan Deepal S05 is a C-segment SUV offering two powertrain options, with power ranging from 272 horsepower to 435 horsepower.
Profile against the market: BYD Atto 2 vs Changan Deepal S05
BYD Atto 2Comfort- Changan Deepal S05RWD Max
BYD Atto 2 or Changan Deepal S05 — who wins where
Changan Deepal S05 leads 9 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmChangan Deepal S05 +58 km
- Battery kWhChangan Deepal S05 +4 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmChangan Deepal S05 −1.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSChangan Deepal S05 +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sChangan Deepal S05 −0.4 s
- Top speed km/hChangan Deepal S05 +20 km/h
- DC charging kWChangan Deepal S05 +13 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minChangan Deepal S05 −2 min
- Weight ↓ kgBYD Atto 2 −220 kg
- Boot lChangan Deepal S05 +42 l
Technical data: BYD Atto 2 vs Changan Deepal S05
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BYD Atto 2 Comfort | Changan Deepal S05 RWD Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 430 km | 488 km | Changan +58 km |
| Battery | 64.8 kWh | 68.8 kWh | Changan +4 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.4 kWh/100 km | 15.9 kWh/100 km | Changan −1.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 155 kW | 168 kW | Changan +13 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 25 min | 23 min | Changan −2 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12 km/min | 14.9 km/min | Changan +2.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 272 PS | Changan +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 7.5 s | Changan −0.4 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 180 km/h | Changan +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1720 kg | 1940 kg | BYD −220 kg |
| Boot | 450 l | 492 l | Changan +42 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4310 mm | 4598 mm | Changan +288 mm |
| Width | 1830 mm | 1900 mm | Changan +70 mm |
| Height | 1675 mm | 1600 mm | BYD +75 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2620 mm | 2880 mm | Changan +260 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BYD Atto 2
Changan Deepal S05
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
BYD Atto 2
Changan Deepal S05
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BYD Atto 2 or Changan Deepal S05?
The Changan Deepal S05 goes further: 488 km WLTP against the 430 km of the BYD Atto 2. That is a difference of 58 km.
How do the drivetrains of the BYD Atto 2 and the Changan Deepal S05 differ?
The BYD Atto 2 has FWD and 204 PS. The Changan Deepal S05 has RWD and 272 PS.
Which is more powerful — BYD Atto 2 or Changan Deepal S05?
The Changan Deepal S05 is stronger: 272 PS against the 204 PS of the BYD Atto 2. The gap is 68 PS.
Which charges faster?
The BYD Atto 2 accepts up to 155 kW DC, the Changan Deepal S05 up to 168 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 25 and 23 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.