BMW iX5 vs Maserati Grecale Folgore
BMW iX5 leads 6 to 3
Biggest differences: DC charging — BMW iX5 460 kW, Maserati Grecale Folgore 150 kW · WLTP range — BMW iX5 845 km, Maserati Grecale Folgore 580 km · Battery — BMW iX5 141 kWh, Maserati Grecale Folgore 105 kWh.
BMW iX5
The BMW iX5 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers 578 horsepower, a range of up to 845 km according to the WLTP standard, and supports DC fast charging up to 460 kW.
Maserati Grecale Folgore
The Maserati Grecale Folgore is an all-wheel-drive electric SUV offering a WLTP range of 580 kilometers and a power output of 557 horsepower.
Profile against the market: BMW iX5 vs Maserati Grecale Folgore
BMW iX560 xDrive
Maserati Grecale Folgore105 kWh AWD
BMW iX5 or Maserati Grecale Folgore — who wins where
BMW iX5 leads 6 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmBMW iX5 +265 km
- Battery kWhBMW iX5 +36 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX5 −0.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBMW iX5 +21 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMaserati Grecale Folgore −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hMaserati Grecale Folgore +10 km/h
- DC charging kWBMW iX5 +310 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgMaserati Grecale Folgore −270 kg
- Boot lBMW iX5 +120 l
Technical data: BMW iX5 vs Maserati Grecale Folgore
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BMW iX5 60 xDrive | Maserati Grecale Folgore 105 kWh AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 845 km | 580 km | BMW +265 km |
| Battery | 141 kWh | 105 kWh | BMW +36 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 20.1 kWh/100 km | 20.9 kWh/100 km | BMW −0.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 460 kW | 150 kW | BMW +310 kW |
| AC charging | 22 kW | 22 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 23 min | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | 25.7 km/min | — | — |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | BMW +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 578 PS | 557 PS | BMW +21 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.6 s | 4.1 s | Maserati −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 220 km/h | Maserati +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2825 kg | 2555 kg | Maserati −270 kg |
| Boot | 655 l | 535 l | BMW +120 l |
| Length | 4994 mm | 4865 mm | BMW +129 mm |
| Width | 2000 mm | 1948 mm | BMW +52 mm |
| Height | 1748 mm | 1651 mm | BMW +97 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3035 mm | 2903 mm | BMW +132 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BMW iX5
Maserati Grecale Folgore
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Maserati Grecale Folgore
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BMW iX5 or Maserati Grecale Folgore?
The BMW iX5 goes further: 845 km WLTP against the 580 km of the Maserati Grecale Folgore. That is a difference of 265 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The BMW iX5 takes more: 655 l against 535 l in the Maserati Grecale Folgore. The difference is 120 l.
Which charges faster?
The BMW iX5 accepts up to 460 kW DC, the Maserati Grecale Folgore up to 150 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The BMW iX5 uses less electricity: 20.1 kWh/100 km against 20.9 kWh/100 km in the Maserati Grecale Folgore. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 120 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.