BMW iX5 vs BYD Tang

BMW iX5 leads 10 to 1

Biggest differences: Boot — BMW iX5 655 l, BYD Tang 235 l · DC charging — BMW iX5 460 kW, BYD Tang 170 kW · AC charging — BMW iX5 22 kW, BYD Tang 11 kW.

BMW iX5

The BMW iX5 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers 578 horsepower, a range of up to 845 km according to the WLTP standard, and supports DC fast charging up to 460 kW.

BYD Tang

An electric SUV in the E-segment, featuring a powerful engine.

Profile against the market: BMW iX5 vs BYD Tang

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX5 or BYD Tang — who wins where

BMW iX5 leads 10 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX5 +315 km
    BMW iX5
    845
    BYD Tang
    530
  • Battery kWhBMW iX5 +32.2 kWh
    BMW iX5
    141
    BYD Tang
    108.8
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX5 −3.9 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX5
    20.1
    BYD Tang
    24
  • Power PSBMW iX5 +61 PS
    BMW iX5
    578
    BYD Tang
    517
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sBMW iX5 −0.3 s
    BMW iX5
    4.6
    BYD Tang
    4.9
  • Top speed km/hBMW iX5 +20 km/h
    BMW iX5
    210
    BYD Tang
    190
  • DC charging kWBMW iX5 +290 kW
    BMW iX5
    460
    BYD Tang
    170
  • AC charging kWBMW iX5 +11 kW
    BMW iX5
    22
    BYD Tang
    11
  • Charging ↓ minBMW iX5 −23 min
    BMW iX5
    23
    BYD Tang
    46
  • Weight ↓ kgBYD Tang −195 kg
    BMW iX5
    2825
    BYD Tang
    2630
  • Boot lBMW iX5 +420 l
    BMW iX5
    655
    BYD Tang
    235

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX5 vs BYD Tang

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX5 vs BYD Tang
Key parameters BMW iX5
60 xDrive
BYD Tang
Flagship
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range845 km530 kmBMW +315 km
Battery141 kWh108.8 kWhBMW +32.2 kWh
Consumption ↓20.1 kWh/100 km24 kWh/100 kmBMW −3.9 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging460 kW170 kWBMW +290 kW
AC charging22 kW11 kWBMW +11 kW
Charging 10–80% ↓23 min46 minBMW −23 min
Range per minute of charging25.7 km/min8.1 km/minBMW +17.6 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VBMW +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power578 PS517 PSBMW +61 PS
0–100 km/h ↓4.6 s4.9 sBMW −0.3 s
Top speed210 km/h190 km/hBMW +20 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓2825 kg2630 kgBYD −195 kg
Boot655 l235 lBMW +420 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly BYD
Length4994 mm4970 mmBMW +24 mm
Width2000 mm1955 mmBMW +45 mm
Height1748 mm1745 mmBMW +3 mm
Wheelbase3035 mm2820 mmBMW +215 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX5

Cost per 100 km6.03
Monthly75
Yearly905

BYD Tang

Cost per 100 km7.2
Monthly90
Yearly1080

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX5

BYD Tang

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX5 or BYD Tang?

The BMW iX5 goes further: 845 km WLTP against the 530 km of the BYD Tang. That is a difference of 315 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the BYD Tang — its 108.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX5, with 141 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The BMW iX5 takes more: 655 l against 235 l in the BYD Tang. The difference is 420 l.

Which charges faster?

The BMW iX5 accepts up to 460 kW DC, the BYD Tang up to 170 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 23 and 46 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.