BMW iX3 vs Peugeot e-5008

BMW iX3 leads 7 to 2

Biggest differences: DC charging — BMW iX3 400 kW, Peugeot e-5008 160 kW · Power — BMW iX3 469 PS, Peugeot e-5008 231 PS · 0–100 km/h — BMW iX3 4.9 s, Peugeot e-5008 9.6 s.

BMW iX3

BMW iX3 is a D-segment SUV in two variants: WLTP range from 637 to 805 km, power from 320 to 469 hp.

Peugeot e-5008

Peugeot e-5008 is a seven-seat D-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in three variants: WLTP range from 476 to 669 km, power from 214 to 325 hp.

Profile against the market: BMW iX3 vs Peugeot e-5008

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX3 or Peugeot e-5008 — who wins where

BMW iX3 leads 7 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX3 +136 km
    BMW iX3
    805
    Peugeot e-5008
    669
  • Battery kWhBMW iX3 +11.8 kWh
    BMW iX3
    108.7
    Peugeot e-5008
    96.9
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX3 −3 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX3
    15.1
    Peugeot e-5008
    18.1
  • Power PSBMW iX3 +238 PS
    BMW iX3
    469
    Peugeot e-5008
    231
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sBMW iX3 −4.7 s
    BMW iX3
    4.9
    Peugeot e-5008
    9.6
  • Top speed km/hBMW iX3 +40 km/h
    BMW iX3
    210
    Peugeot e-5008
    170
  • DC charging kWBMW iX3 +240 kW
    BMW iX3
    400
    Peugeot e-5008
    160
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BMW iX3
    11
    Peugeot e-5008
    11
  • Weight ↓ kgPeugeot e-5008 −44 kg
    BMW iX3
    2285
    Peugeot e-5008
    2241
  • Boot lPeugeot e-5008 +228 l
    BMW iX3
    520
    Peugeot e-5008
    748

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX3 vs Peugeot e-5008

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX3 vs Peugeot e-5008
Key parameters BMW iX3
50 xDrive
Peugeot e-5008
230 Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range805 km669 kmBMW +136 km
Battery108.7 kWh96.9 kWhBMW +11.8 kWh
Consumption ↓15.1 kWh/100 km18.1 kWh/100 kmBMW −3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging400 kW160 kWBMW +240 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging ⚠21 min 10–80%27 min 20–80%6 min
Range per minute of charging26.8 km/min14.9 km/minBMW +11.9 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VBMW +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power469 PS231 PSBMW +238 PS
0–100 km/h ↓4.9 s9.6 sBMW −4.7 s
Top speed210 km/h170 km/hBMW +40 km/h
DrivetrainAWDFWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓2285 kg2241 kgPeugeot −44 kg
Boot520 l748 lPeugeot +228 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4782 mm4791 mmPeugeot +9 mm
Width1895 mm1890 mmBMW +5 mm
Height1635 mm1690 mmPeugeot +55 mm
Wheelbase2897 mm2900 mmPeugeot +3 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX3

Cost per 100 km4.53
Monthly57
Yearly679

Peugeot e-5008

Cost per 100 km5.43
Monthly68
Yearly815

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX3

Peugeot e-5008

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX3 or Peugeot e-5008?

The BMW iX3 goes further: 805 km WLTP against the 669 km of the Peugeot e-5008. That is a difference of 136 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX3 and the Peugeot e-5008 differ?

The BMW iX3 has AWD and 469 PS. The Peugeot e-5008 has FWD and 231 PS.

Which is more powerful — BMW iX3 or Peugeot e-5008?

The BMW iX3 is stronger: 469 PS against the 231 PS of the Peugeot e-5008. The gap is 238 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Peugeot e-5008 takes more: 748 l against 520 l in the BMW iX3. The difference is 228 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.