BMW iX2 vs Changan Deepal S05
Biggest differences: Power — BMW iX2 204 PS, Changan Deepal S05 272 PS · DC charging — BMW iX2 130 kW, Changan Deepal S05 168 kW · Charging 10–80% — BMW iX2 29 min, Changan Deepal S05 23 min.
BMW iX2
The BMW iX2 is a crossover in the C segment that offers two all-electric variants, both boasting a WLTP range exceeding 470 kilometers.
Changan Deepal S05
The Changan Deepal S05 is a C-segment SUV offering two powertrain options, with power ranging from 272 horsepower to 435 horsepower.
Profile against the market: BMW iX2 vs Changan Deepal S05
BMW iX2eDrive20- Changan Deepal S05RWD Max
BMW iX2 or Changan Deepal S05 — who wins where
Changan Deepal S05 leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmBMW iX2 +28 km
- Battery kWhChangan Deepal S05 +3.6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX2 −1.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSChangan Deepal S05 +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sChangan Deepal S05 −1.1 s
- Top speed km/hChangan Deepal S05 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWChangan Deepal S05 +38 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minChangan Deepal S05 −6 min
- Weight ↓ kgBMW iX2 −55 kg
- Boot lBMW iX2 +33 l
Technical data: BMW iX2 vs Changan Deepal S05
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BMW iX2 eDrive20 | Changan Deepal S05 RWD Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 516 km | 488 km | BMW +28 km |
| Battery | 65.2 kWh | 68.8 kWh | Changan +3.6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.2 kWh/100 km | 15.9 kWh/100 km | BMW −1.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 130 kW | 168 kW | Changan +38 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 29 min | 23 min | Changan −6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12.5 km/min | 14.9 km/min | Changan +2.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 272 PS | Changan +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.6 s | 7.5 s | Changan −1.1 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 180 km/h | Changan +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1885 kg | 1940 kg | BMW −55 kg |
| Boot | 525 l | 492 l | BMW +33 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Changan |
| Length | 4554 mm | 4598 mm | Changan +44 mm |
| Width | 1845 mm | 1900 mm | Changan +55 mm |
| Height | 1560 mm | 1600 mm | Changan +40 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2692 mm | 2880 mm | Changan +188 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BMW iX2
Changan Deepal S05
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S05
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BMW iX2 or Changan Deepal S05?
The BMW iX2 goes further: 516 km WLTP against the 488 km of the Changan Deepal S05. That is a difference of 28 km.
Why does the Changan Deepal S05 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the BMW iX2?
The Changan Deepal S05 carries 68.8 kWh and covers 488 km, while the BMW iX2 with its 65.2 kWh battery does 516 km. Energy use decides it: 15.9 against 14.2 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX2 and the Changan Deepal S05 differ?
The BMW iX2 has FWD and 204 PS. The Changan Deepal S05 has RWD and 272 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Changan Deepal S05 — its 68.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX2, with 65.2 kWh, does not offer it.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.