BMW i4 vs Mazda 6e

Biggest differences: DC charging — BMW i4 205 kW, Mazda 6e 90 kW · Charging 10–80% — BMW i4 30 min, Mazda 6e 47 min · Boot — BMW i4 470 l, Mazda 6e 336 l.

BMW i4

The BMW i4 is an all-electric sedan in the D segment, offering a wide range of powertrain configurations with varying ranges and performance levels.

Mazda 6e

The Mazda 6e is an electric sedan in the D-segment, offering two rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants with different battery capacities and DC charging capabilities.

Profile against the market: BMW i4 vs Mazda 6e

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW i4 or Mazda 6e — who wins where

BMW i4 leads 9 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW i4 +48 km
    BMW i4
    600
    Mazda 6e
    552
  • Battery kWhBMW i4 +1.3 kWh
    BMW i4
    81.3
    Mazda 6e
    80
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmBMW i4 −1.1 kWh/100 km
    BMW i4
    15.4
    Mazda 6e
    16.5
  • Power PSBMW i4 +95 PS
    BMW i4
    340
    Mazda 6e
    245
  • 0–100 km/h sBMW i4 −2.1 s
    BMW i4
    5.7
    Mazda 6e
    7.8
  • Top speed km/hBMW i4 +15 km/h
    BMW i4
    190
    Mazda 6e
    175
  • DC charging kWBMW i4 +115 kW
    BMW i4
    205
    Mazda 6e
    90
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BMW i4
    11
    Mazda 6e
    11
  • Charging minBMW i4 −17 min
    BMW i4
    30
    Mazda 6e
    47
  • Weight kgMazda 6e −88 kg
    BMW i4
    2050
    Mazda 6e
    1962
  • Boot lBMW i4 +134 l
    BMW i4
    470
    Mazda 6e
    336

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW i4 vs Mazda 6e

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW i4 vs Mazda 6e
Key parameters BMW i4
eDrive40
Mazda 6e
Long Range 80 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range600 km552 kmBMW +48 km
Battery81.3 kWh80 kWhBMW +1.3 kWh
Consumption15.4 kWh/100 km16.5 kWh/100 kmBMW −1.1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging205 kW90 kWBMW +115 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%30 min47 minBMW −17 min
Range per minute of charging14 km/min8.2 km/minBMW +5.8 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power340 PS245 PSBMW +95 PS
0–100 km/h5.7 s7.8 sBMW −2.1 s
Top speed190 km/h175 km/hBMW +15 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight2050 kg1962 kgMazda −88 kg
Boot470 l336 lBMW +134 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Mazda
Length4783 mm4921 mmMazda +138 mm
Width1852 mm1890 mmMazda +38 mm
Height1448 mm1491 mmMazda +43 mm
Wheelbase2856 mm2895 mmMazda +39 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW i4

Cost per 100 km4.62
Monthly58
Yearly693

Mazda 6e

Cost per 100 km4.95
Monthly62
Yearly743

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW i4

Mazda 6e

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW i4 or Mazda 6e?

The BMW i4 goes further: 600 km WLTP against the 552 km of the Mazda 6e. That is a difference of 48 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Mazda 6e — its 80 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW i4, with 81.3 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — BMW i4 or Mazda 6e?

The BMW i4 is stronger: 340 PS against the 245 PS of the Mazda 6e. The gap is 95 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The BMW i4 takes more: 470 l against 336 l in the Mazda 6e. The difference is 134 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.