Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Peugeot e-5008
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, Peugeot e-5008 160 kW · Boot — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 511 l, Peugeot e-5008 348 l · 0–100 km/h — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 6.6 s, Peugeot e-5008 9.6 s.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Peugeot e-5008
The Peugeot e-5008 is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three different powertrain configurations and battery capacities.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Peugeot e-5008
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
Peugeot e-5008230 Long Range
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Peugeot e-5008 — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 8 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +15 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot e-5008 +2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −2.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +75 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −3 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +40 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +110 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −41 kg
- Boot lAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +163 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Peugeot e-5008
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 664 km | Audi +15 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 96.9 kWh | Peugeot +2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 18.1 kWh/100 km | Audi −2.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 160 kW | Audi +110 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 22 min 10–80% | 27 min 20–80% | 5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 14.8 km/min | Audi +6.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Audi +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 231 PS | Audi +75 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 9.6 s | Audi −3 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 170 km/h | Audi +40 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2241 kg | Audi −41 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 348 l | Audi +163 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Peugeot |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4791 mm | Peugeot +20 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1890 mm | Audi +49 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1690 mm | Peugeot +79 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2900 mm | Peugeot +7 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Peugeot e-5008
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Peugeot e-5008
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Peugeot e-5008?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 664 km of the Peugeot e-5008. That is a difference of 15 km.
Why does the Peugeot e-5008 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron?
The Peugeot e-5008 carries 96.9 kWh and covers 664 km, while the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron with its 94.9 kWh battery does 679 km. Energy use decides it: 18.1 against 15.3 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron and the Peugeot e-5008 differ?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 306 PS. The Peugeot e-5008 has FWD and 231 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Peugeot e-5008 — its 96.9 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.