Peugeot e-5008 vs Volvo EX60
Biggest differences: DC charging — Peugeot e-5008 160 kW, Volvo EX60 400 kW · Power — Peugeot e-5008 231 PS, Volvo EX60 510 PS · 0–100 km/h — Peugeot e-5008 9.6 s, Volvo EX60 4.6 s.
Peugeot e-5008
The Peugeot e-5008 is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three different powertrain configurations and battery capacities.
Volvo EX60
The Volvo EX60 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering two different powertrain options with varying power outputs and battery capacities.
Profile against the market: Peugeot e-5008 vs Volvo EX60
Peugeot e-5008230 Long Range
Volvo EX60P10 AWD
Peugeot e-5008 or Volvo EX60 — who wins where
Volvo EX60 leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot e-5008 +4 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot e-5008 +1.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolvo EX60 −1.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX60 +279 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX60 −5 s
- Top speed km/hVolvo EX60 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo EX60 +240 kW
- AC charging kWVolvo EX60 +11 kW
- Weight ↓ kgPeugeot e-5008 −34 kg
- Boot lVolvo EX60 +175 l
Technical data: Peugeot e-5008 vs Volvo EX60
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range | Volvo EX60 P10 AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 664 km | 660 km | Peugeot +4 km |
| Battery | 96.9 kWh | 95 kWh | Peugeot +1.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.1 kWh/100 km | 16.2 kWh/100 km | Volvo −1.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 160 kW | 400 kW | Volvo +240 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Volvo +11 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 27 min 20–80% | 16 min 10–80% | 11 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.8 km/min | 28.9 km/min | Volvo +14.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Volvo +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 231 PS | 510 PS | Volvo +279 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 9.6 s | 4.6 s | Volvo −5 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 180 km/h | Volvo +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2241 kg | 2275 kg | Peugeot −34 kg |
| Boot | 348 l | 523 l | Volvo +175 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4791 mm | 4803 mm | Volvo +12 mm |
| Width | 1890 mm | 1908 mm | Volvo +18 mm |
| Height | 1690 mm | 1635 mm | Peugeot +55 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2970 mm | Volvo +70 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Peugeot e-5008
Volvo EX60
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Peugeot e-5008
Volvo EX60
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
How do the drivetrains of the Peugeot e-5008 and the Volvo EX60 differ?
The Peugeot e-5008 has FWD and 231 PS. The Volvo EX60 has AWD and 510 PS.
Which is more powerful — Peugeot e-5008 or Volvo EX60?
The Volvo EX60 is stronger: 510 PS against the 231 PS of the Peugeot e-5008. The gap is 279 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Volvo EX60 takes more: 523 l against 348 l in the Peugeot e-5008. The difference is 175 l.
Which charges faster?
The Peugeot e-5008 accepts up to 160 kW DC, the Volvo EX60 up to 400 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.