Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Leapmotor C10
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, Leapmotor C10 180 kW · WLTP range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 679 km, Leapmotor C10 510 km · Consumption — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 15.3 kWh/100 km, Leapmotor C10 18 kWh/100 km.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Leapmotor C10
The Leapmotor C10 is an SUV in the D segment, offering two rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants with different battery capacities and performance specifications.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Leapmotor C10
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
Leapmotor C10Design Long Range RWD (81,9 kWh)
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Leapmotor C10 — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 6 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +169 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +13 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −2.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +7 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sLeapmotor C10 −0.4 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +20 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +90 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Leapmotor C10
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Leapmotor C10 Design Long Range RWD (81,9 kWh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 510 km | Audi +169 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 81.9 kWh | Audi +13 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 18 kWh/100 km | Audi −2.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 180 kW | Audi +90 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 22 min 10–80% | 22 min 30–80% | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 11.6 km/min | Audi +10 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 299 PS | Audi +7 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 6.2 s | Leapmotor −0.4 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 190 km/h | Audi +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | — | — |
| Boot | 511 l | — | — |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Leapmotor |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4739 mm | Audi +32 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1900 mm | Audi +39 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1680 mm | Leapmotor +69 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2825 mm | Audi +68 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Leapmotor C10
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Leapmotor C10
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Leapmotor C10?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 510 km of the Leapmotor C10. That is a difference of 169 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Leapmotor C10 — its 81.9 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the Leapmotor C10 up to 180 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron uses less electricity: 15.3 kWh/100 km against 18 kWh/100 km in the Leapmotor C10. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 405 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.