Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Genesis GV60
Biggest differences: Power — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 306 PS, Genesis GV60 229 PS · Charging 10–80% — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 22 min, Genesis GV60 18 min · WLTP range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 679 km, Genesis GV60 561 km.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Genesis GV60
The Genesis GV60 is a crossover (segment D) offering either rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, with power ranging from 229 to 490 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Genesis GV60
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
Genesis GV60Premium RWD
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Genesis GV60 — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 8 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +118 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +10.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −1.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +77 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −1.2 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +25 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +30 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minGenesis GV60 −4 min
- Weight ↓ kgGenesis GV60 −150 kg
- Boot lAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +79 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Genesis GV60
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Genesis GV60 Premium RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 561 km | Audi +118 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 84 kWh | Audi +10.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 16.7 kWh/100 km | Audi −1.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 240 kW | Audi +30 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 18 min | Genesis −4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 21.8 km/min | Genesis +0.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 229 PS | Audi +77 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 7.8 s | Audi −1.2 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 185 km/h | Audi +25 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2050 kg | Genesis −150 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 432 l | Audi +79 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Genesis |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4515 mm | Audi +256 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1890 mm | Audi +49 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1580 mm | Audi +31 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2900 mm | Genesis +7 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Genesis GV60
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Genesis GV60
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Genesis GV60?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 561 km of the Genesis GV60. That is a difference of 118 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Genesis GV60 — its 84 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Genesis GV60?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is stronger: 306 PS against the 229 PS of the Genesis GV60. The gap is 77 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron takes more: 511 l against 432 l in the Genesis GV60. The difference is 79 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.