Elaris BEO vs Genesis GV60
Biggest differences: DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Genesis GV60 240 kW · Top speed — Elaris BEO 150 km/h, Genesis GV60 185 km/h · Consumption — Elaris BEO 19.3 kWh/100 km, Genesis GV60 16.7 kWh/100 km.
Elaris BEO
The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.
Genesis GV60
The Genesis GV60 is a crossover (segment D) offering either rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, with power ranging from 229 to 490 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Genesis GV60
- Elaris BEOStandard
Genesis GV60Premium RWD
Elaris BEO or Genesis GV60 — who wins where
Genesis GV60 leads 5 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmGenesis GV60 +72 km
- Battery kWhElaris BEO +2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmGenesis GV60 −2.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSGenesis GV60 +25 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hGenesis GV60 +35 km/h
- DC charging kWGenesis GV60 +140 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgElaris BEO −95 kg
- Boot lElaris BEO +35 l
Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Genesis GV60
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Elaris BEO Standard | Genesis GV60 Premium RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 489 km | 561 km | Genesis +72 km |
| Battery | 86 kWh | 84 kWh | Elaris +2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 19.3 kWh/100 km | 16.7 kWh/100 km | Genesis −2.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 240 kW | Genesis +140 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 45 min 20–80% | 18 min 10–80% | 27 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.5 km/min | 21.8 km/min | Genesis +15.3 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 800 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 229 PS | Genesis +25 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 7.8 s | — |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 185 km/h | Genesis +35 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1955 kg | 2050 kg | Elaris −95 kg |
| Boot | 467 l | 432 l | Elaris +35 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Genesis |
| Length | 4698 mm | 4515 mm | Elaris +183 mm |
| Width | 1908 mm | 1890 mm | Elaris +18 mm |
| Height | 1696 mm | 1580 mm | Elaris +116 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2800 mm | 2900 mm | Genesis +100 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Elaris BEO
Genesis GV60
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Elaris BEO
Genesis GV60
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Genesis GV60?
The Genesis GV60 goes further: 561 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 72 km.
Why does the Elaris BEO have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Genesis GV60?
The Elaris BEO carries 86 kWh and covers 489 km, while the Genesis GV60 with its 84 kWh battery does 561 km. Energy use decides it: 19.3 against 16.7 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the Genesis GV60 differ?
The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The Genesis GV60 has RWD and 229 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Genesis GV60 — its 84 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Elaris BEO, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.