Genesis GV60 vs Toyota bZ4X
Biggest differences: DC charging — Genesis GV60 240 kW, Toyota bZ4X 150 kW · Charging 10–80% — Genesis GV60 18 min, Toyota bZ4X 28 min · Battery — Genesis GV60 84 kWh, Toyota bZ4X 69 kWh.
Genesis GV60
The Genesis GV60 is a crossover (segment D) offering either rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, with power ranging from 229 to 490 horsepower.
Toyota bZ4X
The Toyota bZ4X is a compact SUV (segment D) that offers both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, as well as battery packs with varying capacities.
Profile against the market: Genesis GV60 vs Toyota bZ4X
Genesis GV60Premium RWD
Toyota bZ4XFWD 73.1 kWh
Genesis GV60 or Toyota bZ4X — who wins where
It's a tie: 5 to 5
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmToyota bZ4X +8 km
- Battery kWhGenesis GV60 +15 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmToyota bZ4X −2.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSGenesis GV60 +5 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sToyota bZ4X −0.4 s
- Top speed km/hGenesis GV60 +25 km/h
- DC charging kWGenesis GV60 +90 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minGenesis GV60 −10 min
- Weight ↓ kgToyota bZ4X −120 kg
- Boot lToyota bZ4X +20 l
Technical data: Genesis GV60 vs Toyota bZ4X
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Genesis GV60 Premium RWD | Toyota bZ4X FWD 73.1 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 561 km | 569 km | Toyota +8 km |
| Battery | 84 kWh | 69 kWh | Genesis +15 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.7 kWh/100 km | 13.9 kWh/100 km | Toyota −2.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 240 kW | 150 kW | Genesis +90 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 18 min | 28 min | Genesis −10 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.8 km/min | 14.2 km/min | Genesis +7.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Genesis +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 229 PS | 224 PS | Genesis +5 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.8 s | 7.4 s | Toyota −0.4 s |
| Top speed | 185 km/h | 160 km/h | Genesis +25 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2050 kg | 1930 kg | Toyota −120 kg |
| Boot | 432 l | 452 l | Toyota +20 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4515 mm | 4690 mm | Toyota +175 mm |
| Width | 1890 mm | 1860 mm | Genesis +30 mm |
| Height | 1580 mm | 1650 mm | Toyota +70 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2850 mm | Genesis +50 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Genesis GV60
Toyota bZ4X
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Genesis GV60
Toyota bZ4X
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Genesis GV60 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Toyota bZ4X?
The Genesis GV60 carries 84 kWh and covers 561 km, while the Toyota bZ4X with its 69 kWh battery does 569 km. Energy use decides it: 16.7 against 13.9 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Genesis GV60 and the Toyota bZ4X differ?
The Genesis GV60 has RWD and 229 PS. The Toyota bZ4X has FWD and 224 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Genesis GV60 accepts up to 240 kW DC, the Toyota bZ4X up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 18 and 28 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Toyota bZ4X uses less electricity: 13.9 kWh/100 km against 16.7 kWh/100 km in the Genesis GV60. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 420 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.