Elaris BEO vs Toyota bZ4X

Biggest differences: DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Toyota bZ4X 150 kW · Consumption — Elaris BEO 19.3 kWh/100 km, Toyota bZ4X 13.9 kWh/100 km · Battery — Elaris BEO 86 kWh, Toyota bZ4X 69 kWh.

Elaris BEO

The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.

Toyota bZ4X

The Toyota bZ4X is a compact SUV (segment D) that offers both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, as well as battery packs with varying capacities.

Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Toyota bZ4X

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Elaris BEO or Toyota bZ4X — who wins where

Toyota bZ4X leads 6 to 2

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmToyota bZ4X +80 km
    Elaris BEO
    489
    Toyota bZ4X
    569
  • Battery kWhElaris BEO +17 kWh
    Elaris BEO
    86
    Toyota bZ4X
    69
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmToyota bZ4X −5.4 kWh/100 km
    Elaris BEO
    19.3
    Toyota bZ4X
    13.9
  • Power PSToyota bZ4X +20 PS
    Elaris BEO
    204
    Toyota bZ4X
    224
  • 0–100 km/h sNo data
    Elaris BEO
    Toyota bZ4X
    7.4
  • Top speed km/hToyota bZ4X +10 km/h
    Elaris BEO
    150
    Toyota bZ4X
    160
  • DC charging kWToyota bZ4X +50 kW
    Elaris BEO
    100
    Toyota bZ4X
    150
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Elaris BEO
    11
    Toyota bZ4X
    11
  • Weight kgToyota bZ4X −25 kg
    Elaris BEO
    1955
    Toyota bZ4X
    1930
  • Boot lElaris BEO +15 l
    Elaris BEO
    467
    Toyota bZ4X
    452

Add a third car

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Toyota bZ4X

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Toyota bZ4X
Key parameters Elaris BEO
Standard
Toyota bZ4X
FWD 73.1 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range489 km569 kmToyota +80 km
Battery86 kWh69 kWhElaris +17 kWh
Consumption19.3 kWh/100 km13.9 kWh/100 kmToyota −5.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW150 kWToyota +50 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 45 min 20–80%28 min 10–80%17 min
Range per minute of charging6.5 km/min14.2 km/minToyota +7.7 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS224 PSToyota +20 PS
0–100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed150 km/h160 km/hToyota +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1955 kg1930 kgToyota −25 kg
Boot467 l452 lElaris +15 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Toyota
Length4698 mm4690 mmElaris +8 mm
Width1908 mm1860 mmElaris +48 mm
Height1696 mm1650 mmElaris +46 mm
Wheelbase2800 mm2850 mmToyota +50 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Elaris BEO

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Toyota bZ4X

Cost per 100 km4.17
Monthly52
Yearly626

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Elaris BEO

Toyota bZ4X

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Toyota bZ4X?

The Toyota bZ4X goes further: 569 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 80 km.

Why does the Elaris BEO have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Toyota bZ4X?

The Elaris BEO carries 86 kWh and covers 489 km, while the Toyota bZ4X with its 69 kWh battery does 569 km. Energy use decides it: 19.3 against 13.9 kWh/100 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Toyota bZ4X — its 69 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Elaris BEO, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.

Which charges faster?

The Elaris BEO accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Toyota bZ4X up to 150 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.