Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs GAC Aion V
Biggest differences: Power — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 306 PS, GAC Aion V 204 PS · DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, GAC Aion V 180 kW · WLTP range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 679 km, GAC Aion V 510 km.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
GAC Aion V
This electric SUV, belonging to the D-segment, offers a range of 510 kilometers in the WLTP cycle and boasts a power output of 204 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs GAC Aion V
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
GAC Aion V77 kWh
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or GAC Aion V — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 9 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +169 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +19.6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −1.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +102 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −1.4 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +30 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +90 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −2 min
- Weight ↓ kgGAC Aion V −390 kg
- Boot lAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +69 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs GAC Aion V
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | GAC Aion V 77 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 510 km | Audi +169 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 75.3 kWh | Audi +19.6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 16.7 kWh/100 km | Audi −1.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 180 kW | Audi +90 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 24 min | Audi −2 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 14.9 km/min | Audi +6.7 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Audi +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 204 PS | Audi +102 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 8 s | Audi −1.4 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | Audi +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 1810 kg | GAC −390 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 442 l | Audi +69 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only GAC |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4605 mm | Audi +166 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1876 mm | Audi +63 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1699 mm | GAC +88 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2775 mm | Audi +118 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
GAC Aion V
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
GAC Aion V
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or GAC Aion V?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 510 km of the GAC Aion V. That is a difference of 169 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron and the GAC Aion V differ?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 306 PS. The GAC Aion V has FWD and 204 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the GAC Aion V — its 75.3 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or GAC Aion V?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is stronger: 306 PS against the 204 PS of the GAC Aion V. The gap is 102 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.