GAC Aion V vs Xpeng G6

Biggest differences: DC charging — GAC Aion V 180 kW, Xpeng G6 451 kW · Charging 10–80% — GAC Aion V 24 min, Xpeng G6 12 min · Power — GAC Aion V 204 PS, Xpeng G6 296 PS.

GAC Aion V

This electric SUV, belonging to the D-segment, offers a range of 510 kilometers in the WLTP cycle and boasts a power output of 204 horsepower.

Xpeng G6

The Xpeng G6 is a crossover (segment D) that offers three different powertrain options and supports fast DC charging up to 451 kW.

Profile against the market: GAC Aion V vs Xpeng G6

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

GAC Aion V or Xpeng G6 — who wins where

Xpeng G6 leads 8 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmXpeng G6 +15 km
    GAC Aion V
    510
    Xpeng G6
    525
  • Battery kWhXpeng G6 +4.7 kWh
    GAC Aion V
    75.3
    Xpeng G6
    80
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmGAC Aion V −0.8 kWh/100 km
    GAC Aion V
    16.7
    Xpeng G6
    17.5
  • Power PSXpeng G6 +92 PS
    GAC Aion V
    204
    Xpeng G6
    296
  • 0–100 km/h sXpeng G6 −1.3 s
    GAC Aion V
    8
    Xpeng G6
    6.7
  • Top speed km/hXpeng G6 +22 km/h
    GAC Aion V
    180
    Xpeng G6
    202
  • DC charging kWXpeng G6 +271 kW
    GAC Aion V
    180
    Xpeng G6
    451
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    GAC Aion V
    11
    Xpeng G6
    11
  • Charging minXpeng G6 −12 min
    GAC Aion V
    24
    Xpeng G6
    12
  • Weight kgGAC Aion V −305 kg
    GAC Aion V
    1810
    Xpeng G6
    2115
  • Boot lXpeng G6 +129 l
    GAC Aion V
    442
    Xpeng G6
    571

Add a third car

Technical data: GAC Aion V vs Xpeng G6

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: GAC Aion V vs Xpeng G6
Key parameters GAC Aion V
77 kWh
Xpeng G6
Long Range RWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range510 km525 kmXpeng +15 km
Battery75.3 kWh80 kWhXpeng +4.7 kWh
Consumption16.7 kWh/100 km17.5 kWh/100 kmGAC −0.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging180 kW451 kWXpeng +271 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%24 min12 minXpeng −12 min
Range per minute of charging14.9 km/min30.6 km/minXpeng +15.7 km/min
Voltage400 V800 VXpeng +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS296 PSXpeng +92 PS
0–100 km/h8 s6.7 sXpeng −1.3 s
Top speed180 km/h202 km/hXpeng +22 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1810 kg2115 kgGAC −305 kg
Boot442 l571 lXpeng +129 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4605 mm4758 mmXpeng +153 mm
Width1876 mm1920 mmXpeng +44 mm
Height1699 mm1650 mmGAC +49 mm
Wheelbase2775 mm2890 mmXpeng +115 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

GAC Aion V

Cost per 100 km5.01
Monthly63
Yearly752

Xpeng G6

Cost per 100 km5.25
Monthly66
Yearly788

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

GAC Aion V

Xpeng G6

Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — GAC Aion V or Xpeng G6?

The Xpeng G6 goes further: 525 km WLTP against the 510 km of the GAC Aion V. That is a difference of 15 km.

How do the drivetrains of the GAC Aion V and the Xpeng G6 differ?

The GAC Aion V has FWD and 204 PS. The Xpeng G6 has RWD and 296 PS.

Which is more powerful — GAC Aion V or Xpeng G6?

The Xpeng G6 is stronger: 296 PS against the 204 PS of the GAC Aion V. The gap is 92 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Xpeng G6 takes more: 571 l against 442 l in the GAC Aion V. The difference is 129 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.