Elaris BEO vs GAC Aion V

Biggest differences: DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, GAC Aion V 180 kW · Top speed — Elaris BEO 150 km/h, GAC Aion V 180 km/h · Consumption — Elaris BEO 19.3 kWh/100 km, GAC Aion V 16.7 kWh/100 km.

Elaris BEO

The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.

GAC Aion V

This electric SUV, belonging to the D-segment, offers a range of 510 kilometers in the WLTP cycle and boasts a power output of 204 horsepower.

Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs GAC Aion V

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Elaris BEO or GAC Aion V — who wins where

GAC Aion V leads 5 to 2

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmGAC Aion V +21 km
    Elaris BEO
    489
    GAC Aion V
    510
  • Battery kWhElaris BEO +10.7 kWh
    Elaris BEO
    86
    GAC Aion V
    75.3
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmGAC Aion V −2.6 kWh/100 km
    Elaris BEO
    19.3
    GAC Aion V
    16.7
  • Power PSNo difference
    Elaris BEO
    204
    GAC Aion V
    204
  • 0–100 km/h sNo data
    Elaris BEO
    GAC Aion V
    8
  • Top speed km/hGAC Aion V +30 km/h
    Elaris BEO
    150
    GAC Aion V
    180
  • DC charging kWGAC Aion V +80 kW
    Elaris BEO
    100
    GAC Aion V
    180
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Elaris BEO
    11
    GAC Aion V
    11
  • Weight kgGAC Aion V −145 kg
    Elaris BEO
    1955
    GAC Aion V
    1810
  • Boot lElaris BEO +25 l
    Elaris BEO
    467
    GAC Aion V
    442

Add a third car

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs GAC Aion V

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs GAC Aion V
Key parameters Elaris BEO
Standard
GAC Aion V
77 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range489 km510 kmGAC +21 km
Battery86 kWh75.3 kWhElaris +10.7 kWh
Consumption19.3 kWh/100 km16.7 kWh/100 kmGAC −2.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW180 kWGAC +80 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 45 min 20–80%24 min 10–80%21 min
Range per minute of charging6.5 km/min14.9 km/minGAC +8.4 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS204 PSNo difference
0–100 km/h8 s
Top speed150 km/h180 km/hGAC +30 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1955 kg1810 kgGAC −145 kg
Boot467 l442 lElaris +25 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly GAC
Length4698 mm4605 mmElaris +93 mm
Width1908 mm1876 mmElaris +32 mm
Height1696 mm1699 mmGAC +3 mm
Wheelbase2800 mm2775 mmElaris +25 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Elaris BEO

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

GAC Aion V

Cost per 100 km5.01
Monthly63
Yearly752

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Elaris BEO

GAC Aion V

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or GAC Aion V?

The GAC Aion V goes further: 510 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 21 km.

Why does the Elaris BEO have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the GAC Aion V?

The Elaris BEO carries 86 kWh and covers 489 km, while the GAC Aion V with its 75.3 kWh battery does 510 km. Energy use decides it: 19.3 against 16.7 kWh/100 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the GAC Aion V — its 75.3 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Elaris BEO, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.

Which charges faster?

The Elaris BEO accepts up to 100 kW DC, the GAC Aion V up to 180 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.