Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, Ford Mustang Mach-E 150 kW · Charging 10–80% — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 22 min, Ford Mustang Mach-E 36 min · Boot — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 511 l, Ford Mustang Mach-E 402 l.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is a D-segment SUV offering four different powertrain and battery configurations with WLTP ranges from 470 to 600 km.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
Ford Mustang Mach-EExtended Range RWD
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Ford Mustang Mach-E — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 8 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +79 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +3.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −2.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +12 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sFord Mustang Mach-E −0.4 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +30 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +120 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −14 min
- Weight ↓ kgFord Mustang Mach-E −71 kg
- Boot lAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +109 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 600 km | Audi +79 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 91 kWh | Audi +3.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 17.5 kWh/100 km | Audi −2.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 150 kW | Audi +120 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 36 min | Audi −14 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 11.7 km/min | Audi +9.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Audi +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 294 PS | Audi +12 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 6.2 s | Ford −0.4 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | Audi +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2129 kg | Ford −71 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 402 l | Audi +109 l |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4713 mm | Audi +58 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1881 mm | Audi +58 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1597 mm | Audi +14 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2984 mm | Ford +91 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Ford Mustang Mach-E?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 600 km of the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That is a difference of 79 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron takes more: 511 l against 402 l in the Ford Mustang Mach-E. The difference is 109 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the Ford Mustang Mach-E up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 22 and 36 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron uses less electricity: 15.3 kWh/100 km against 17.5 kWh/100 km in the Ford Mustang Mach-E. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 330 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.