Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Zeekr 7X
Biggest differences: DC charging — Ford Mustang Mach-E 150 kW, Zeekr 7X 420 kW · Charging 10–80% — Ford Mustang Mach-E 36 min, Zeekr 7X 16 min · AC charging — Ford Mustang Mach-E 11 kW, Zeekr 7X 22 kW.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is a D-segment SUV offering four different powertrain and battery configurations with WLTP ranges from 470 to 600 km.
Zeekr 7X
This electric SUV, belonging to the D-segment, offers three different powertrain options with power ranging from 421 horsepower to 646 horsepower, and features fast DC charging capabilities.
Profile against the market: Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Zeekr 7X
Ford Mustang Mach-EExtended Range RWD
Zeekr 7XLong Range RWD
Ford Mustang Mach-E or Zeekr 7X — who wins where
Zeekr 7X leads 9 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmZeekr 7X +15 km
- Battery kWhZeekr 7X +9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord Mustang Mach-E −0.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSZeekr 7X +127 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sZeekr 7X −0.2 s
- Top speed km/hZeekr 7X +30 km/h
- DC charging kWZeekr 7X +270 kW
- AC charging kWZeekr 7X +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minZeekr 7X −20 min
- Weight ↓ kgFord Mustang Mach-E −286 kg
- Boot lZeekr 7X +137 l
Technical data: Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Zeekr 7X
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range RWD | Zeekr 7X Long Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 600 km | 615 km | Zeekr +15 km |
| Battery | 91 kWh | 100 kWh | Zeekr +9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.5 kWh/100 km | 17.7 kWh/100 km | Ford −0.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 420 kW | Zeekr +270 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Zeekr +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 36 min | 16 min | Zeekr −20 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 11.7 km/min | 26.9 km/min | Zeekr +15.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Zeekr +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 294 PS | 421 PS | Zeekr +127 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.2 s | 6 s | Zeekr −0.2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 210 km/h | Zeekr +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2129 kg | 2415 kg | Ford −286 kg |
| Boot | 402 l | 539 l | Zeekr +137 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Zeekr |
| Length | 4713 mm | 4787 mm | Zeekr +74 mm |
| Width | 1881 mm | 1930 mm | Zeekr +49 mm |
| Height | 1597 mm | 1650 mm | Zeekr +53 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2984 mm | 2900 mm | Ford +84 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Zeekr 7X
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Ford Mustang Mach-E or Zeekr 7X?
The Zeekr 7X goes further: 615 km WLTP against the 600 km of the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That is a difference of 15 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Zeekr 7X — its 100 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Ford Mustang Mach-E, with 91 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Ford Mustang Mach-E or Zeekr 7X?
The Zeekr 7X is stronger: 421 PS against the 294 PS of the Ford Mustang Mach-E. The gap is 127 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Zeekr 7X takes more: 539 l against 402 l in the Ford Mustang Mach-E. The difference is 137 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.