Elaris BEO vs Zeekr 7X

Biggest differences: DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Zeekr 7X 420 kW · Power — Elaris BEO 204 PS, Zeekr 7X 421 PS · AC charging — Elaris BEO 11 kW, Zeekr 7X 22 kW.

Elaris BEO

The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.

Zeekr 7X

This electric SUV, belonging to the D-segment, offers three different powertrain options with power ranging from 421 horsepower to 646 horsepower, and features fast DC charging capabilities.

Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Zeekr 7X

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Elaris BEO or Zeekr 7X — who wins where

Zeekr 7X leads 8 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmZeekr 7X +126 km
    Elaris BEO
    489
    Zeekr 7X
    615
  • Battery kWhZeekr 7X +14 kWh
    Elaris BEO
    86
    Zeekr 7X
    100
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmZeekr 7X −1.6 kWh/100 km
    Elaris BEO
    19.3
    Zeekr 7X
    17.7
  • Power PSZeekr 7X +217 PS
    Elaris BEO
    204
    Zeekr 7X
    421
  • 0–100 km/h sNo data
    Elaris BEO
    Zeekr 7X
    6
  • Top speed km/hZeekr 7X +60 km/h
    Elaris BEO
    150
    Zeekr 7X
    210
  • DC charging kWZeekr 7X +320 kW
    Elaris BEO
    100
    Zeekr 7X
    420
  • AC charging kWZeekr 7X +11 kW
    Elaris BEO
    11
    Zeekr 7X
    22
  • Weight kgElaris BEO −460 kg
    Elaris BEO
    1955
    Zeekr 7X
    2415
  • Boot lZeekr 7X +72 l
    Elaris BEO
    467
    Zeekr 7X
    539

Add a third car

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Zeekr 7X

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Zeekr 7X
Key parameters Elaris BEO
Standard
Zeekr 7X
Long Range RWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range489 km615 kmZeekr +126 km
Battery86 kWh100 kWhZeekr +14 kWh
Consumption19.3 kWh/100 km17.7 kWh/100 kmZeekr −1.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW420 kWZeekr +320 kW
AC charging11 kW22 kWZeekr +11 kW
Charging 45 min 20–80%16 min 10–80%29 min
Range per minute of charging6.5 km/min26.9 km/minZeekr +20.4 km/min
Voltage800 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS421 PSZeekr +217 PS
0–100 km/h6 s
Top speed150 km/h210 km/hZeekr +60 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1955 kg2415 kgElaris −460 kg
Boot467 l539 lZeekr +72 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Zeekr
Length4698 mm4787 mmZeekr +89 mm
Width1908 mm1930 mmZeekr +22 mm
Height1696 mm1650 mmElaris +46 mm
Wheelbase2800 mm2900 mmZeekr +100 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Elaris BEO

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Zeekr 7X

Cost per 100 km5.31
Monthly66
Yearly797

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Elaris BEO

Zeekr 7X

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Zeekr 7X?

The Zeekr 7X goes further: 615 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 126 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the Zeekr 7X differ?

The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The Zeekr 7X has RWD and 421 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Zeekr 7X — its 100 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Elaris BEO, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Elaris BEO or Zeekr 7X?

The Zeekr 7X is stronger: 421 PS against the 204 PS of the Elaris BEO. The gap is 217 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.