Elaris BEO vs Ford Mustang Mach-E

Biggest differences: DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Ford Mustang Mach-E 150 kW · Power — Elaris BEO 204 PS, Ford Mustang Mach-E 294 PS · WLTP range — Elaris BEO 489 km, Ford Mustang Mach-E 600 km.

Elaris BEO

The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is a D-segment SUV offering four different powertrain and battery configurations with WLTP ranges from 470 to 600 km.

Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Ford Mustang Mach-E

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Elaris BEO or Ford Mustang Mach-E — who wins where

Ford Mustang Mach-E leads 6 to 2

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmFord Mustang Mach-E +111 km
    Elaris BEO
    489
    Ford Mustang Mach-E
    600
  • Battery kWhFord Mustang Mach-E +5 kWh
    Elaris BEO
    86
    Ford Mustang Mach-E
    91
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmFord Mustang Mach-E −1.8 kWh/100 km
    Elaris BEO
    19.3
    Ford Mustang Mach-E
    17.5
  • Power PSFord Mustang Mach-E +90 PS
    Elaris BEO
    204
    Ford Mustang Mach-E
    294
  • 0–100 km/h sNo data
    Elaris BEO
    Ford Mustang Mach-E
    6.2
  • Top speed km/hFord Mustang Mach-E +30 km/h
    Elaris BEO
    150
    Ford Mustang Mach-E
    180
  • DC charging kWFord Mustang Mach-E +50 kW
    Elaris BEO
    100
    Ford Mustang Mach-E
    150
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Elaris BEO
    11
    Ford Mustang Mach-E
    11
  • Weight kgElaris BEO −174 kg
    Elaris BEO
    1955
    Ford Mustang Mach-E
    2129
  • Boot lElaris BEO +65 l
    Elaris BEO
    467
    Ford Mustang Mach-E
    402

Add a third car

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Ford Mustang Mach-E

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
Key parameters Elaris BEO
Standard
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Extended Range RWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range489 km600 kmFord +111 km
Battery86 kWh91 kWhFord +5 kWh
Consumption19.3 kWh/100 km17.5 kWh/100 kmFord −1.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW150 kWFord +50 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 45 min 20–80%36 min 10–80%9 min
Range per minute of charging6.5 km/min11.7 km/minFord +5.2 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS294 PSFord +90 PS
0–100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed150 km/h180 km/hFord +30 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1955 kg2129 kgElaris −174 kg
Boot467 l402 lElaris +65 l
Length4698 mm4713 mmFord +15 mm
Width1908 mm1881 mmElaris +27 mm
Height1696 mm1597 mmElaris +99 mm
Wheelbase2800 mm2984 mmFord +184 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Elaris BEO

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Ford Mustang Mach-E

Cost per 100 km5.25
Monthly66
Yearly788

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Elaris BEO

Ford Mustang Mach-E

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Ford Mustang Mach-E?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E goes further: 600 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 111 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the Ford Mustang Mach-E differ?

The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The Ford Mustang Mach-E has RWD and 294 PS.

Which is more powerful — Elaris BEO or Ford Mustang Mach-E?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is stronger: 294 PS against the 204 PS of the Elaris BEO. The gap is 90 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Elaris BEO takes more: 467 l against 402 l in the Ford Mustang Mach-E. The difference is 65 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.