Elaris BEO vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
Biggest differences: DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Ford Mustang Mach-E 150 kW · Power — Elaris BEO 204 PS, Ford Mustang Mach-E 294 PS · WLTP range — Elaris BEO 489 km, Ford Mustang Mach-E 600 km.
Elaris BEO
The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is a D-segment SUV offering four different powertrain and battery configurations with WLTP ranges from 470 to 600 km.
Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
- Elaris BEOStandard
Ford Mustang Mach-EExtended Range RWD
Elaris BEO or Ford Mustang Mach-E — who wins where
Ford Mustang Mach-E leads 6 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmFord Mustang Mach-E +111 km
- Battery kWhFord Mustang Mach-E +5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord Mustang Mach-E −1.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSFord Mustang Mach-E +90 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hFord Mustang Mach-E +30 km/h
- DC charging kWFord Mustang Mach-E +50 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgElaris BEO −174 kg
- Boot lElaris BEO +65 l
Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Elaris BEO Standard | Ford Mustang Mach-EExtended Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 489 km | 600 km | Ford +111 km |
| Battery | 86 kWh | 91 kWh | Ford +5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 19.3 kWh/100 km | 17.5 kWh/100 km | Ford −1.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 150 kW | Ford +50 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 45 min 20–80% | 36 min 10–80% | 9 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.5 km/min | 11.7 km/min | Ford +5.2 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 294 PS | Ford +90 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 6.2 s | — |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 180 km/h | Ford +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1955 kg | 2129 kg | Elaris −174 kg |
| Boot | 467 l | 402 l | Elaris +65 l |
| Length | 4698 mm | 4713 mm | Ford +15 mm |
| Width | 1908 mm | 1881 mm | Elaris +27 mm |
| Height | 1696 mm | 1597 mm | Elaris +99 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2800 mm | 2984 mm | Ford +184 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Elaris BEO
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Elaris BEO
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Ford Mustang Mach-E?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E goes further: 600 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 111 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the Ford Mustang Mach-E differ?
The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The Ford Mustang Mach-E has RWD and 294 PS.
Which is more powerful — Elaris BEO or Ford Mustang Mach-E?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is stronger: 294 PS against the 204 PS of the Elaris BEO. The gap is 90 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Elaris BEO takes more: 467 l against 402 l in the Ford Mustang Mach-E. The difference is 65 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.




