Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs MG S5 EV
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 175 kW, MG S5 EV 139 kW · Power — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 286 PS, MG S5 EV 231 PS · Weight — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 2070 kg, MG S5 EV 1680 kg.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering four different drive variants with varying power outputs and ranges.
MG S5 EV
The MG S5 EV is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering two rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants with different battery capacities and motor power outputs.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs MG S5 EV
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron45
MG S5 EVLong Range
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or MG S5 EV — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +93 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +13 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −0.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +55 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMG S5 EV −0.4 s
- Top speed km/hMG S5 EV +10 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +36 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgMG S5 EV −390 kg
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +82 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs MG S5 EV
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 | MG S5 EV Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 573 km | 480 km | Audi +93 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 64 kWh | Audi +13 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.4 kWh/100 km | 15.5 kWh/100 km | Audi −0.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 175 kW | 139 kW | Audi +36 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 28 min | 28 min | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.3 km/min | 12 km/min | Audi +2.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 231 PS | Audi +55 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.7 s | 6.3 s | MG −0.4 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 190 km/h | MG +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2070 kg | 1680 kg | MG −390 kg |
| Boot | 535 l | 453 l | Audi +82 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only MG |
| Length | 4588 mm | 4476 mm | Audi +112 mm |
| Width | 1865 mm | 1849 mm | Audi +16 mm |
| Height | 1614 mm | 1621 mm | MG +7 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2764 mm | 2730 mm | Audi +34 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
MG S5 EV
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or MG S5 EV?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 480 km of the MG S5 EV. That is a difference of 93 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the MG S5 EV — its 64 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron takes more: 535 l against 453 l in the MG S5 EV. The difference is 82 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 175 kW DC, the MG S5 EV up to 139 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 28 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.