Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Lynk & Co 02
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 6 to 1
Biggest differences: WLTP range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 576 km, Lynk & Co 02 445 km · Boot — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 527 l, Lynk & Co 02 410 l · Consumption — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 13.4 kWh/100 km, Lynk & Co 02 17.1 kWh/100 km.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is a C-segment coupe SUV, in model year 2027 in four variants: WLTP range from 451 to 576 km, power from 204 to 340 hp.
Lynk & Co 02
The Lynk & Co 02 Long Range (Model Year 2025) is a compact SUV with rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 445 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Lynk & Co 02
Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron performance
Lynk & Co 02Long Range
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Lynk & Co 02 — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 6 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +131 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +11 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −3.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +14 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sLynk & Co 02 −1.1 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +15 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +117 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Lynk & Co 02
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron e-tron performance | Lynk & Co 02 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 576 km | 445 km | Audi +131 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 66 kWh | Audi +11 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.4 kWh/100 km | 17.1 kWh/100 km | Audi −3.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 150 kW | Audi +15 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 30 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 10.4 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 272 PS | Audi +14 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 5.5 s | Lynk & Co −1.1 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 1820 kg | — |
| Boot | 527 l | 410 l | Audi +117 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Lynk & Co |
| Length | — | 4460 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1845 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1573 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2755 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Lynk & Co 02
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Lynk & Co 02
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Lynk & Co 02?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron goes further: 576 km WLTP against the 445 km of the Lynk & Co 02. That is a difference of 131 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Lynk & Co 02 — its 66 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron takes more: 527 l against 410 l in the Lynk & Co 02. The difference is 117 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 165 kW DC, the Lynk & Co 02 up to 150 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.