Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Leapmotor B10
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 7 to 1
Biggest differences: WLTP range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 576 km, Leapmotor B10 434 km · Power — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 286 PS, Leapmotor B10 218 PS · Consumption — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 13.4 kWh/100 km, Leapmotor B10 17.3 kWh/100 km.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is a C-segment coupe SUV, in model year 2027 in four variants: WLTP range from 451 to 576 km, power from 204 to 340 hp.
Leapmotor B10
The Leapmotor B10 is an all-electric C-segment SUV with rear-wheel drive (RWD): it offers 218 horsepower, a range of up to 434 km according to the WLTP standard, and supports DC fast charging up to 168 kW.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Leapmotor B10
Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron performance
Leapmotor B10Long Range
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Leapmotor B10 — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 7 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +142 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +9.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −3.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −1.4 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +10 km/h
- DC charging kWLeapmotor B10 +3 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +97 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Leapmotor B10
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron e-tron performance | Leapmotor B10 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 576 km | 434 km | Audi +142 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 67.1 kWh | Audi +9.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.4 kWh/100 km | 17.3 kWh/100 km | Audi −3.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 168 kW | Leapmotor +3 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 30–80% ↓ | — | 18 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 12.1 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 218 PS | Audi +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 8 s | Audi −1.4 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h | Audi +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 1845 kg | — |
| Boot | 527 l | 430 l | Audi +97 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Leapmotor |
| Length | — | 4515 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1885 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1655 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2735 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Leapmotor B10
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Leapmotor B10
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Leapmotor B10?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron goes further: 576 km WLTP against the 434 km of the Leapmotor B10. That is a difference of 142 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Leapmotor B10 — its 67.1 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron takes more: 527 l against 430 l in the Leapmotor B10. The difference is 97 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 165 kW DC, the Leapmotor B10 up to 168 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.