Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Leapmotor B10
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 175 kW, Leapmotor B10 100 kW · WLTP range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 573 km, Leapmotor B10 434 km · Power — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 286 PS, Leapmotor B10 218 PS.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering four different drive variants with varying power outputs and ranges.
Leapmotor B10
The Leapmotor B10 is a compact SUV with rear-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of up to 434 kilometers in the Long Range version.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Leapmotor B10
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron45
Leapmotor B10Long Range
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Leapmotor B10 — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 8 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +139 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +9.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −1.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −1.3 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +10 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +75 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgLeapmotor B10 −225 kg
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +105 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Leapmotor B10
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 | Leapmotor B10 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 573 km | 434 km | Audi +139 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 67.1 kWh | Audi +9.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.4 kWh/100 km | 17.3 kWh/100 km | Audi −1.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 175 kW | 100 kW | Audi +75 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 28 min 10–80% | 20 min 30–80% | 8 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.3 km/min | 10.9 km/min | Audi +3.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 218 PS | Audi +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.7 s | 8 s | Audi −1.3 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h | Audi +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2070 kg | 1845 kg | Leapmotor −225 kg |
| Boot | 535 l | 430 l | Audi +105 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Leapmotor |
| Length | 4588 mm | 4515 mm | Audi +73 mm |
| Width | 1865 mm | 1885 mm | Leapmotor +20 mm |
| Height | 1614 mm | 1655 mm | Leapmotor +41 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2764 mm | 2735 mm | Audi +29 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Leapmotor B10
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Leapmotor B10
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Leapmotor B10?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 434 km of the Leapmotor B10. That is a difference of 139 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Leapmotor B10 — its 67.1 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron takes more: 535 l against 430 l in the Leapmotor B10. The difference is 105 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 175 kW DC, the Leapmotor B10 up to 100 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.