Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs BMW iX2
Biggest differences: Power — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 286 PS, BMW iX2 204 PS · DC charging — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 175 kW, BMW iX2 130 kW · 0–100 km/h — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 6.7 s, BMW iX2 8.6 s.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering four different drive variants with varying power outputs and ranges.
BMW iX2
The BMW iX2 is a crossover in the C segment that offers two all-electric variants, both boasting a WLTP range exceeding 470 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs BMW iX2
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron45
BMW iX2eDrive20
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or BMW iX2 — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 8 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +57 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +11.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX2 −1.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +82 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −1.9 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +10 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +45 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −1 min
- Weight ↓ kgBMW iX2 −185 kg
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +10 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs BMW iX2
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 | BMW iX2 eDrive20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 573 km | 516 km | Audi +57 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 65.2 kWh | Audi +11.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.4 kWh/100 km | 14.2 kWh/100 km | BMW −1.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 175 kW | 130 kW | Audi +45 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 28 min | 29 min | Audi −1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.3 km/min | 12.5 km/min | Audi +1.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 204 PS | Audi +82 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.7 s | 8.6 s | Audi −1.9 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h | Audi +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2070 kg | 1885 kg | BMW −185 kg |
| Boot | 535 l | 525 l | Audi +10 l |
| Length | 4588 mm | 4554 mm | Audi +34 mm |
| Width | 1865 mm | 1845 mm | Audi +20 mm |
| Height | 1614 mm | 1560 mm | Audi +54 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2764 mm | 2692 mm | Audi +72 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
BMW iX2
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or BMW iX2?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 516 km of the BMW iX2. That is a difference of 57 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and the BMW iX2 differ?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The BMW iX2 has FWD and 204 PS.
Which is more powerful — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or BMW iX2?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is stronger: 286 PS against the 204 PS of the BMW iX2. The gap is 82 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 175 kW DC, the BMW iX2 up to 130 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 29 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.