Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs BMW iX2
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 8 to 0
Biggest differences: Power — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 286 PS, BMW iX2 204 PS · 0–100 km/h — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 6.6 s, BMW iX2 8.6 s · DC charging — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 165 kW, BMW iX2 130 kW.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is a C-segment coupe SUV, in model year 2027 in four variants: WLTP range from 451 to 576 km, power from 204 to 340 hp.
BMW iX2
BMW iX2 is a C-segment crossover in two variants: the eDrive20 with a WLTP range of 512 km and the xDrive30 with 306 hp.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs BMW iX2
Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron performance
BMW iX2eDrive20
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or BMW iX2 — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 8 to 0
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +64 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +11.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −0.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +82 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −2 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +10 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +35 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +2 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs BMW iX2
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron e-tron performance | BMW iX2 eDrive20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 576 km | 512 km | Audi +64 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 65.2 kWh | Audi +11.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.4 kWh/100 km | 14.2 kWh/100 km | Audi −0.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 130 kW | Audi +35 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 29 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 12.4 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 204 PS | Audi +82 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 8.6 s | Audi −2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h | Audi +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 1885 kg | — |
| Boot | 527 l | 525 l | Audi +2 l |
| Length | — | 4554 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1845 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1560 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2692 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
BMW iX2
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or BMW iX2?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron goes further: 576 km WLTP against the 512 km of the BMW iX2. That is a difference of 64 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and the BMW iX2 differ?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The BMW iX2 has FWD and 204 PS.
Which is more powerful — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or BMW iX2?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is stronger: 286 PS against the 204 PS of the BMW iX2. The gap is 82 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 165 kW DC, the BMW iX2 up to 130 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.