Audi e-tron GT vs BMW i7

Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — Audi e-tron GT 18 min, BMW i7 28 min · 0–100 km/h — Audi e-tron GT 4 s, BMW i7 5.5 s · DC charging — Audi e-tron GT 320 kW, BMW i7 250 kW.

Audi e-tron GT

The Audi e-tron GT is an all-electric sedan in the F segment, offering all-wheel drive and high-performance powertrains.

BMW i7

The BMW i7 is a large, all-electric sedan in the F segment, offering a long range and powerful performance in various configurations.

Profile against the market: Audi e-tron GT vs BMW i7

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Audi e-tron GT or BMW i7 — who wins where

Audi e-tron GT leads 7 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW i7 +105 km
    Audi e-tron GT
    622
    BMW i7
    727
  • Battery kWhBMW i7 +15.5 kWh
    Audi e-tron GT
    97
    BMW i7
    112.5
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmAudi e-tron GT −2.6 kWh/100 km
    Audi e-tron GT
    17.8
    BMW i7
    20.4
  • Power PSAudi e-tron GT +48 PS
    Audi e-tron GT
    503
    BMW i7
    455
  • 0–100 km/h sAudi e-tron GT −1.5 s
    Audi e-tron GT
    4
    BMW i7
    5.5
  • Top speed km/hAudi e-tron GT +35 km/h
    Audi e-tron GT
    245
    BMW i7
    210
  • DC charging kWAudi e-tron GT +70 kW
    Audi e-tron GT
    320
    BMW i7
    250
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Audi e-tron GT
    11
    BMW i7
    11
  • Charging minAudi e-tron GT −10 min
    Audi e-tron GT
    18
    BMW i7
    28
  • Weight kgAudi e-tron GT −415 kg
    Audi e-tron GT
    2280
    BMW i7
    2695
  • Boot lBMW i7 +95 l
    Audi e-tron GT
    405
    BMW i7
    500

Add a third car

Technical data: Audi e-tron GT vs BMW i7

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Audi e-tron GT vs BMW i7
Key parameters Audi e-tron GT
quattro
BMW i7
50 xDrive
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range622 km727 kmBMW +105 km
Battery97 kWh112.5 kWhBMW +15.5 kWh
Consumption17.8 kWh/100 km20.4 kWh/100 kmAudi −2.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging320 kW250 kWAudi +70 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%18 min28 minAudi −10 min
Range per minute of charging24.2 km/min18.2 km/minAudi +6 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VAudi +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power503 PS455 PSAudi +48 PS
0–100 km/h4 s5.5 sAudi −1.5 s
Top speed245 km/h210 km/hAudi +35 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD
Practicality
Weight2280 kg2695 kgAudi −415 kg
Boot405 l500 lBMW +95 l
Length4997 mm5395 mmBMW +398 mm
Width1964 mm1950 mmAudi +14 mm
Height1369 mm1550 mmBMW +181 mm
Wheelbase2900 mm3215 mmBMW +315 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Audi e-tron GT

Cost per 100 km5.34
Monthly67
Yearly801

BMW i7

Cost per 100 km6.12
Monthly76
Yearly918

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Audi e-tron GT

BMW i7

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment F

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Audi e-tron GT or BMW i7?

The BMW i7 goes further: 727 km WLTP against the 622 km of the Audi e-tron GT. That is a difference of 105 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The BMW i7 takes more: 500 l against 405 l in the Audi e-tron GT. The difference is 95 l.

Which charges faster?

The Audi e-tron GT accepts up to 320 kW DC, the BMW i7 up to 250 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 18 and 28 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Audi e-tron GT uses less electricity: 17.8 kWh/100 km against 20.4 kWh/100 km in the BMW i7. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 390 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.