Alpine A390 vs Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Biggest differences: AC charging — Alpine A390 22 kW, Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 11 kW · DC charging — Alpine A390 150 kW, Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW · 0–100 km/h — Alpine A390 4.8 s, Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 6.6 s.
Alpine A390
The electric SUV in the D segment offers two all-wheel drive (AWD) variants, with power ranging from 400 to 470 horsepower.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Profile against the market: Alpine A390 vs Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Alpine A390GT
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
Alpine A390 or Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron — who wins where
It's a tie: 5 to 5
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +124 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +5.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −3.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAlpine A390 +94 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAlpine A390 −1.8 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +10 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +120 kW
- AC charging kWAlpine A390 +11 kW
- Weight ↓ kgAlpine A390 −76 kg
- Boot lAlpine A390 +21 l
Technical data: Alpine A390 vs Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Alpine A390 GT | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 555 km | 679 km | Audi +124 km |
| Battery | 89 kWh | 94.9 kWh | Audi +5.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.7 kWh/100 km | 15.3 kWh/100 km | Audi −3.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 270 kW | Audi +120 kW |
| AC charging | 22 kW | 11 kW | Alpine +11 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 29 min 15–80% | 22 min 10–80% | 7 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12.4 km/min | 21.6 km/min | Audi +9.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Audi +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 400 PS | 306 PS | Alpine +94 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.8 s | 6.6 s | Alpine −1.8 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 210 km/h | Audi +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2124 kg | 2200 kg | Alpine −76 kg |
| Boot | 532 l | 511 l | Alpine +21 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Alpine |
| Length | 4615 mm | 4771 mm | Audi +156 mm |
| Width | 1885 mm | 1939 mm | Audi +54 mm |
| Height | 1532 mm | 1611 mm | Audi +79 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2708 mm | 2893 mm | Audi +185 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Alpine A390
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Alpine A390
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Alpine A390 or Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 555 km of the Alpine A390. That is a difference of 124 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Alpine A390 and the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron differ?
The Alpine A390 has AWD and 400 PS. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 306 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Alpine A390 — its 89 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Alpine A390 accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron up to 270 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.