Alpine A390 vs Toyota bZ4X

Biggest differences: AC charging — Alpine A390 22 kW, Toyota bZ4X 11 kW · Power — Alpine A390 400 PS, Toyota bZ4X 224 PS · 0–100 km/h — Alpine A390 4.8 s, Toyota bZ4X 7.4 s.

Alpine A390

The electric SUV in the D segment offers two all-wheel drive (AWD) variants, with power ranging from 400 to 470 horsepower.

Toyota bZ4X

The Toyota bZ4X is a compact SUV (segment D) that offers both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, as well as battery packs with varying capacities.

Profile against the market: Alpine A390 vs Toyota bZ4X

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Alpine A390 or Toyota bZ4X — who wins where

Alpine A390 leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmToyota bZ4X +14 km
    Alpine A390
    555
    Toyota bZ4X
    569
  • Battery kWhAlpine A390 +20 kWh
    Alpine A390
    89
    Toyota bZ4X
    69
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmToyota bZ4X −4.8 kWh/100 km
    Alpine A390
    18.7
    Toyota bZ4X
    13.9
  • Power PSAlpine A390 +176 PS
    Alpine A390
    400
    Toyota bZ4X
    224
  • 0–100 km/h sAlpine A390 −2.6 s
    Alpine A390
    4.8
    Toyota bZ4X
    7.4
  • Top speed km/hAlpine A390 +40 km/h
    Alpine A390
    200
    Toyota bZ4X
    160
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    Alpine A390
    150
    Toyota bZ4X
    150
  • AC charging kWAlpine A390 +11 kW
    Alpine A390
    22
    Toyota bZ4X
    11
  • Weight kgToyota bZ4X −194 kg
    Alpine A390
    2124
    Toyota bZ4X
    1930
  • Boot lAlpine A390 +80 l
    Alpine A390
    532
    Toyota bZ4X
    452

Add a third car

Technical data: Alpine A390 vs Toyota bZ4X

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Alpine A390 vs Toyota bZ4X
Key parameters Alpine A390
GT
Toyota bZ4X
FWD 73.1 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range555 km569 kmToyota +14 km
Battery89 kWh69 kWhAlpine +20 kWh
Consumption18.7 kWh/100 km13.9 kWh/100 kmToyota −4.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging150 kW150 kWNo difference
AC charging22 kW11 kWAlpine +11 kW
Charging 29 min 15–80%28 min 10–80%1 min
Range per minute of charging12.4 km/min14.2 km/minToyota +1.8 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power400 PS224 PSAlpine +176 PS
0–100 km/h4.8 s7.4 sAlpine −2.6 s
Top speed200 km/h160 km/hAlpine +40 km/h
DrivetrainAWDFWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2124 kg1930 kgToyota −194 kg
Boot532 l452 lAlpine +80 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4615 mm4690 mmToyota +75 mm
Width1885 mm1860 mmAlpine +25 mm
Height1532 mm1650 mmToyota +118 mm
Wheelbase2708 mm2850 mmToyota +142 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Alpine A390

Cost per 100 km5.61
Monthly70
Yearly841

Toyota bZ4X

Cost per 100 km4.17
Monthly52
Yearly626

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Alpine A390

Toyota bZ4X

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Alpine A390 or Toyota bZ4X?

The Toyota bZ4X goes further: 569 km WLTP against the 555 km of the Alpine A390. That is a difference of 14 km.

Why does the Alpine A390 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Toyota bZ4X?

The Alpine A390 carries 89 kWh and covers 555 km, while the Toyota bZ4X with its 69 kWh battery does 569 km. Energy use decides it: 18.7 against 13.9 kWh/100 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Alpine A390 and the Toyota bZ4X differ?

The Alpine A390 has AWD and 400 PS. The Toyota bZ4X has FWD and 224 PS.

Which is more powerful — Alpine A390 or Toyota bZ4X?

The Alpine A390 is stronger: 400 PS against the 224 PS of the Toyota bZ4X. The gap is 176 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.