Alpine A390 vs Lexus RZ

Biggest differences: Power — Alpine A390 400 PS, Lexus RZ 224 PS · 0–100 km/h — Alpine A390 4.8 s, Lexus RZ 7.5 s · Consumption — Alpine A390 18.7 kWh/100 km, Lexus RZ 14.7 kWh/100 km.

Alpine A390

The electric SUV in the D segment offers two all-wheel drive (AWD) variants, with power ranging from 400 to 470 horsepower.

Lexus RZ

The Lexus RZ is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering three power and drivetrain options with a WLTP range of up to 568 kilometers.

Profile against the market: Alpine A390 vs Lexus RZ

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Alpine A390 or Lexus RZ — who wins where

Alpine A390 leads 5 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmLexus RZ +13 km
    Alpine A390
    555
    Lexus RZ
    568
  • Battery kWhAlpine A390 +17 kWh
    Alpine A390
    89
    Lexus RZ
    72
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmLexus RZ −4 kWh/100 km
    Alpine A390
    18.7
    Lexus RZ
    14.7
  • Power PSAlpine A390 +176 PS
    Alpine A390
    400
    Lexus RZ
    224
  • 0–100 km/h sAlpine A390 −2.7 s
    Alpine A390
    4.8
    Lexus RZ
    7.5
  • Top speed km/hAlpine A390 +40 km/h
    Alpine A390
    200
    Lexus RZ
    160
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    Alpine A390
    150
    Lexus RZ
    150
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Alpine A390
    22
    Lexus RZ
    22
  • Weight kgLexus RZ −129 kg
    Alpine A390
    2124
    Lexus RZ
    1995
  • Boot lAlpine A390 +10 l
    Alpine A390
    532
    Lexus RZ
    522

Add a third car

Technical data: Alpine A390 vs Lexus RZ

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Alpine A390 vs Lexus RZ
Key parameters Alpine A390
GT
Lexus RZ
350e
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range555 km568 kmLexus +13 km
Battery89 kWh72 kWhAlpine +17 kWh
Consumption18.7 kWh/100 km14.7 kWh/100 kmLexus −4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging150 kW150 kWNo difference
AC charging22 kW22 kWNo difference
Charging 29 min 15–80%30 min 10–80%1 min
Range per minute of charging12.4 km/min13.3 km/minLexus +0.9 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power400 PS224 PSAlpine +176 PS
0–100 km/h4.8 s7.5 sAlpine −2.7 s
Top speed200 km/h160 km/hAlpine +40 km/h
DrivetrainAWDFWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2124 kg1995 kgLexus −129 kg
Boot532 l522 lAlpine +10 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Alpine
Length4615 mm4805 mmLexus +190 mm
Width1885 mm1895 mmLexus +10 mm
Height1532 mm1635 mmLexus +103 mm
Wheelbase2708 mm2850 mmLexus +142 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Alpine A390

Cost per 100 km5.61
Monthly70
Yearly841

Lexus RZ

Cost per 100 km4.41
Monthly55
Yearly661

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Alpine A390

Lexus RZ

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Alpine A390 or Lexus RZ?

The Lexus RZ goes further: 568 km WLTP against the 555 km of the Alpine A390. That is a difference of 13 km.

Why does the Alpine A390 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Lexus RZ?

The Alpine A390 carries 89 kWh and covers 555 km, while the Lexus RZ with its 72 kWh battery does 568 km. Energy use decides it: 18.7 against 14.7 kWh/100 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Alpine A390 and the Lexus RZ differ?

The Alpine A390 has AWD and 400 PS. The Lexus RZ has FWD and 224 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Alpine A390 — its 89 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Lexus RZ, with 72 kWh, does not offer it.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.