Alpine A390 vs BMW iX4

BMW iX4 leads 6 to 4

Biggest differences: DC charging — Alpine A390 150 kW, BMW iX4 400 kW · AC charging — Alpine A390 22 kW, BMW iX4 11 kW · WLTP range — Alpine A390 551 km, BMW iX4 828 km.

Alpine A390

Alpine A390 is an electric D-segment SUV offered in two all-wheel drive configurations with a WLTP range of over 540 km.

BMW iX4

The BMW iX4 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers power outputs ranging from 374 to 469 horsepower, a range of up to 828 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 400 kW.

Profile against the market: Alpine A390 vs BMW iX4

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Alpine A390 or BMW iX4 — who wins where

BMW iX4 leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX4 +277 km
    Alpine A390
    551
    BMW iX4
    828
  • Battery kWhBMW iX4 +19.7 kWh
    Alpine A390
    89
    BMW iX4
    108.7
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX4 −3 kWh/100 km
    Alpine A390
    18.7
    BMW iX4
    15.7
  • Power PSBMW iX4 +69 PS
    Alpine A390
    400
    BMW iX4
    469
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sAlpine A390 −0.1 s
    Alpine A390
    4.8
    BMW iX4
    4.9
  • Top speed km/hBMW iX4 +10 km/h
    Alpine A390
    200
    BMW iX4
    210
  • DC charging kWBMW iX4 +250 kW
    Alpine A390
    150
    BMW iX4
    400
  • AC charging kWAlpine A390 +11 kW
    Alpine A390
    22
    BMW iX4
    11
  • Weight ↓ kgAlpine A390 −181 kg
    Alpine A390
    2124
    BMW iX4
    2305
  • Boot lAlpine A390 +42 l
    Alpine A390
    532
    BMW iX4
    490

Add a third car

Technical data: Alpine A390 vs BMW iX4

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Alpine A390 vs BMW iX4
Key parameters Alpine A390
GT
BMW iX4
50 xDrive
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range551 km828 kmBMW +277 km
Battery89 kWh108.7 kWhBMW +19.7 kWh
Consumption ↓18.7 kWh/100 km15.7 kWh/100 kmBMW −3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging150 kW400 kWBMW +250 kW
AC charging22 kW11 kWAlpine +11 kW
Charging ⚠29 min 15–80%21 min 10–80%8 min
Range per minute of charging12.4 km/min27.6 km/minBMW +15.2 km/min
Voltage400 V800 VBMW +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power400 PS469 PSBMW +69 PS
0–100 km/h ↓4.8 s4.9 sAlpine −0.1 s
Top speed200 km/h210 km/hBMW +10 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓2124 kg2305 kgAlpine −181 kg
Boot532 l490 lAlpine +42 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4615 mm4782 mmBMW +167 mm
Width1885 mm1895 mmBMW +10 mm
Height1532 mm1595 mmBMW +63 mm
Wheelbase2708 mm2897 mmBMW +189 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Alpine A390

Cost per 100 km5.61
Monthly70
Yearly841

BMW iX4

Cost per 100 km4.71
Monthly59
Yearly707

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Alpine A390

BMW iX4

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Alpine A390 or BMW iX4?

The BMW iX4 goes further: 828 km WLTP against the 551 km of the Alpine A390. That is a difference of 277 km.

Which charges faster?

The Alpine A390 accepts up to 150 kW DC, the BMW iX4 up to 400 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The BMW iX4 uses less electricity: 15.7 kWh/100 km against 18.7 kWh/100 km in the Alpine A390. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 450 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.