Alpine A390 vs Elaris BEO
Biggest differences: AC charging — Alpine A390 22 kW, Elaris BEO 11 kW · Power — Alpine A390 400 PS, Elaris BEO 204 PS · DC charging — Alpine A390 150 kW, Elaris BEO 100 kW.
Alpine A390
The electric SUV in the D segment offers two all-wheel drive (AWD) variants, with power ranging from 400 to 470 horsepower.
Elaris BEO
The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.
Profile against the market: Alpine A390 vs Elaris BEO
Alpine A390GT- Elaris BEOStandard
Alpine A390 or Elaris BEO — who wins where
Alpine A390 leads 8 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAlpine A390 +66 km
- Battery kWhAlpine A390 +3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAlpine A390 −0.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAlpine A390 +196 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hAlpine A390 +50 km/h
- DC charging kWAlpine A390 +50 kW
- AC charging kWAlpine A390 +11 kW
- Weight ↓ kgElaris BEO −169 kg
- Boot lAlpine A390 +65 l
Technical data: Alpine A390 vs Elaris BEO
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Alpine A390 GT | Elaris BEO Standard | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 555 km | 489 km | Alpine +66 km |
| Battery | 89 kWh | 86 kWh | Alpine +3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.7 kWh/100 km | 19.3 kWh/100 km | Alpine −0.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 100 kW | Alpine +50 kW |
| AC charging | 22 kW | 11 kW | Alpine +11 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 29 min 15–80% | 45 min 20–80% | 16 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12.4 km/min | 6.5 km/min | Alpine +5.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 400 PS | 204 PS | Alpine +196 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.8 s | — | — |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 150 km/h | Alpine +50 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2124 kg | 1955 kg | Elaris −169 kg |
| Boot | 532 l | 467 l | Alpine +65 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Alpine |
| Length | 4615 mm | 4698 mm | Elaris +83 mm |
| Width | 1885 mm | 1908 mm | Elaris +23 mm |
| Height | 1532 mm | 1696 mm | Elaris +164 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2708 mm | 2800 mm | Elaris +92 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Alpine A390
Elaris BEO
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Alpine A390
Elaris BEO
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Alpine A390 or Elaris BEO?
The Alpine A390 goes further: 555 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 66 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Alpine A390 and the Elaris BEO differ?
The Alpine A390 has AWD and 400 PS. The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Alpine A390 — its 89 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Elaris BEO, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Alpine A390 or Elaris BEO?
The Alpine A390 is stronger: 400 PS against the 204 PS of the Elaris BEO. The gap is 196 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.