Alpine A290 vs Geely EX2

Biggest differences: AC charging — Alpine A290 11 kW, Geely EX2 6.6 kW · 0–100 km/h — Alpine A290 7.4 s, Geely EX2 11.5 s · Power — Alpine A290 180 PS, Geely EX2 116 PS.

Alpine A290

This electric hatchback in the B-segment offers two power options, both with the same WLTP range of 380 kilometers.

Geely EX2

The Geely EX2 is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offered with two different powertrain configurations featuring a rear-wheel drive (RWD) system.

Profile against the market: Alpine A290 vs Geely EX2

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Alpine A290 or Geely EX2 — who wins where

Alpine A290 leads 7 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmAlpine A290 +35 km
    Alpine A290
    380
    Geely EX2
    345
  • Battery kWhAlpine A290 +4.9 kWh
    Alpine A290
    52
    Geely EX2
    47.14
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmGeely EX2 −0.3 kWh/100 km
    Alpine A290
    15.8
    Geely EX2
    15.5
  • Power PSAlpine A290 +64 PS
    Alpine A290
    180
    Geely EX2
    116
  • 0–100 km/h sAlpine A290 −4.1 s
    Alpine A290
    7.4
    Geely EX2
    11.5
  • Top speed km/hAlpine A290 +30 km/h
    Alpine A290
    160
    Geely EX2
    130
  • DC charging kWAlpine A290 +20 kW
    Alpine A290
    100
    Geely EX2
    80
  • AC charging kWAlpine A290 +4.4 kW
    Alpine A290
    11
    Geely EX2
    6.6
  • Weight kgGeely EX2 −118 kg
    Alpine A290
    1483
    Geely EX2
    1365
  • Boot lGeely EX2 +49 l
    Alpine A290
    326
    Geely EX2
    375

Add a third car

Technical data: Alpine A290 vs Geely EX2

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Alpine A290 vs Geely EX2
Key parameters Alpine A290
GT
Geely EX2
Max/Ultra
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range380 km345 kmAlpine +35 km
Battery52 kWh47.14 kWhAlpine +4.9 kWh
Consumption15.8 kWh/100 km15.5 kWh/100 kmGeely −0.3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW80 kWAlpine +20 kW
AC charging11 kW6.6 kWAlpine +4.4 kW
Charging 30 min 15–80%25 min 30–80%5 min
Range per minute of charging8.2 km/min6.9 km/minAlpine +1.3 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power180 PS116 PSAlpine +64 PS
0–100 km/h7.4 s11.5 sAlpine −4.1 s
Top speed160 km/h130 km/hAlpine +30 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1483 kg1365 kgGeely −118 kg
Boot326 l375 lGeely +49 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length3997 mm4135 mmGeely +138 mm
Width1823 mm1805 mmAlpine +18 mm
Height1512 mm1580 mmGeely +68 mm
Wheelbase2534 mm2645 mmGeely +111 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Alpine A290

Cost per 100 km4.74
Monthly59
Yearly711

Geely EX2

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Alpine A290

Geely EX2

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Alpine A290 or Geely EX2?

The Alpine A290 goes further: 380 km WLTP against the 345 km of the Geely EX2. That is a difference of 35 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Alpine A290 and the Geely EX2 differ?

The Alpine A290 has FWD and 180 PS. The Geely EX2 has RWD and 116 PS.

Which is more powerful — Alpine A290 or Geely EX2?

The Alpine A290 is stronger: 180 PS against the 116 PS of the Geely EX2. The gap is 64 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Geely EX2 takes more: 375 l against 326 l in the Alpine A290. The difference is 49 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.