Geely EX2 vs Nio Firefly
Biggest differences: AC charging — Geely EX2 6.6 kW, Nio Firefly 11 kW · 0–100 km/h — Geely EX2 11.5 s, Nio Firefly 8.1 s · DC charging — Geely EX2 80 kW, Nio Firefly 100 kW.
Geely EX2
The Geely EX2 is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offered with two different powertrain configurations featuring a rear-wheel drive (RWD) system.
Nio Firefly
The Nio Firefly is a compact hatchback with rear-wheel drive, offering a range of 330 km in the WLTP cycle.
Profile against the market: Geely EX2 vs Nio Firefly
- Geely EX2Max/Ultra
Nio Firefly42.1 kWh RWD
Geely EX2 or Nio Firefly — who wins where
Nio Firefly leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmGeely EX2 +15 km
- Battery kWhGeely EX2 +5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNio Firefly −1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNio Firefly +27 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNio Firefly −3.4 s
- Top speed km/hNio Firefly +20 km/h
- DC charging kWNio Firefly +20 kW
- AC charging kWNio Firefly +4.4 kW
- Weight ↓ kgGeely EX2 −102 kg
- Boot lNio Firefly +29 l
Technical data: Geely EX2 vs Nio Firefly
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Geely EX2 Max/Ultra | Nio Firefly 42.1 kWh RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 345 km | 330 km | Geely +15 km |
| Battery | 47.14 kWh | 42.1 kWh | Geely +5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.5 kWh/100 km | 14.5 kWh/100 km | Nio −1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 80 kW | 100 kW | Nio +20 kW |
| AC charging | 6.6 kW | 11 kW | Nio +4.4 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 25 min 30–80% | 29 min 10–80% | 4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.9 km/min | 8 km/min | Nio +1.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 116 PS | 143 PS | Nio +27 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 11.5 s | 8.1 s | Nio −3.4 s |
| Top speed | 130 km/h | 150 km/h | Nio +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1365 kg | 1467 kg | Geely −102 kg |
| Boot | 375 l | 404 l | Nio +29 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4135 mm | 4003 mm | Geely +132 mm |
| Width | 1805 mm | 1885 mm | Nio +80 mm |
| Height | 1580 mm | 1557 mm | Geely +23 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2645 mm | 2615 mm | Geely +30 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Geely EX2
Nio Firefly
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Geely EX2
Nio Firefly
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Geely EX2 or Nio Firefly?
The Geely EX2 goes further: 345 km WLTP against the 330 km of the Nio Firefly. That is a difference of 15 km.
Which charges faster?
The Geely EX2 accepts up to 80 kW DC, the Nio Firefly up to 100 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Nio Firefly uses less electricity: 14.5 kWh/100 km against 15.5 kWh/100 km in the Geely EX2. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 150 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.