Geely EX2 vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
Biggest differences: Power — Geely EX2 116 PS, Volkswagen ID. Polo 211 PS · AC charging — Geely EX2 6.6 kW, Volkswagen ID. Polo 11 kW · 0–100 km/h — Geely EX2 11.5 s, Volkswagen ID. Polo 7.4 s.
Geely EX2
The Geely EX2 is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offered with two different powertrain configurations featuring a rear-wheel drive (RWD) system.
Volkswagen ID. Polo
The Volkswagen ID. Polo is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offered with three powertrain configurations featuring different ranges and performance levels.
Profile against the market: Geely EX2 vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
- Geely EX2Max/Ultra
Volkswagen ID. Polo52 kWh 155 kW
Geely EX2 or Volkswagen ID. Polo — who wins where
Volkswagen ID. Polo leads 9 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolkswagen ID. Polo +109 km
- Battery kWhVolkswagen ID. Polo +4.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolkswagen ID. Polo −2.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolkswagen ID. Polo +95 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolkswagen ID. Polo −4.1 s
- Top speed km/hVolkswagen ID. Polo +30 km/h
- DC charging kWVolkswagen ID. Polo +25 kW
- AC charging kWVolkswagen ID. Polo +4.4 kW
- Weight ↓ kgGeely EX2 −211 kg
- Boot lVolkswagen ID. Polo +66 l
Technical data: Geely EX2 vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Geely EX2 Max/Ultra | Volkswagen ID. Polo 52 kWh 155 kW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 345 km | 454 km | Volkswagen +109 km |
| Battery | 47.14 kWh | 52 kWh | Volkswagen +4.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.5 kWh/100 km | 13.3 kWh/100 km | Volkswagen −2.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 80 kW | 105 kW | Volkswagen +25 kW |
| AC charging | 6.6 kW | 11 kW | Volkswagen +4.4 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 25 min 30–80% | 24 min 10–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.9 km/min | 13.2 km/min | Volkswagen +6.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 116 PS | 211 PS | Volkswagen +95 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 11.5 s | 7.4 s | Volkswagen −4.1 s |
| Top speed | 130 km/h | 160 km/h | Volkswagen +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1365 kg | 1576 kg | Geely −211 kg |
| Boot | 375 l | 441 l | Volkswagen +66 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4135 mm | 4053 mm | Geely +82 mm |
| Width | 1805 mm | 1816 mm | Volkswagen +11 mm |
| Height | 1580 mm | 1530 mm | Geely +50 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2645 mm | 2600 mm | Geely +45 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Geely EX2
Volkswagen ID. Polo
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Geely EX2
Volkswagen ID. Polo
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Geely EX2 or Volkswagen ID. Polo?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo goes further: 454 km WLTP against the 345 km of the Geely EX2. That is a difference of 109 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Geely EX2 and the Volkswagen ID. Polo differ?
The Geely EX2 has RWD and 116 PS. The Volkswagen ID. Polo has FWD and 211 PS.
Which is more powerful — Geely EX2 or Volkswagen ID. Polo?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo is stronger: 211 PS against the 116 PS of the Geely EX2. The gap is 95 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo takes more: 441 l against 375 l in the Geely EX2. The difference is 66 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.