Abarth 600e vs Jeep Avenger

Biggest differences: Power — Abarth 600e 240 PS, Jeep Avenger 156 PS · 0–100 km/h — Abarth 600e 6.24 s, Jeep Avenger 9 s · Top speed — Abarth 600e 200 km/h, Jeep Avenger 150 km/h.

Abarth 600e

The Abarth 600e is a compact electric crossover with front-wheel drive, offering two power options and a WLTP range of 334 kilometers.

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 400 kilometers according to the WLTP cycle.

Profile against the market: Abarth 600e vs Jeep Avenger

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Abarth 600e or Jeep Avenger — who wins where

Abarth 600e leads 4 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmJeep Avenger +66 km
    Abarth 600e
    334
    Jeep Avenger
    400
  • Battery kWhNo difference
    Abarth 600e
    51
    Jeep Avenger
    51
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmJeep Avenger −2.5 kWh/100 km
    Abarth 600e
    18
    Jeep Avenger
    15.5
  • Power PSAbarth 600e +84 PS
    Abarth 600e
    240
    Jeep Avenger
    156
  • 0–100 km/h sAbarth 600e −2.8 s
    Abarth 600e
    6.24
    Jeep Avenger
    9
  • Top speed km/hAbarth 600e +50 km/h
    Abarth 600e
    200
    Jeep Avenger
    150
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    Abarth 600e
    100
    Jeep Avenger
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Abarth 600e
    11
    Jeep Avenger
    11
  • Weight kgJeep Avenger −104 kg
    Abarth 600e
    1624
    Jeep Avenger
    1520
  • Boot lAbarth 600e +5 l
    Abarth 600e
    360
    Jeep Avenger
    355

Add a third car

Technical data: Abarth 600e vs Jeep Avenger

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Abarth 600e vs Jeep Avenger
Key parameters Abarth 600e
Turismo
Jeep Avenger
Electric
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range334 km400 kmJeep +66 km
Battery51 kWh51 kWhNo difference
Consumption18 kWh/100 km15.5 kWh/100 kmJeep −2.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW100 kWNo difference
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 27 min 20–80%30 min 10–80%3 min
Range per minute of charging7.4 km/min9.3 km/minJeep +1.9 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power240 PS156 PSAbarth +84 PS
0–100 km/h6.24 s9 sAbarth −2.8 s
Top speed200 km/h150 km/hAbarth +50 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1624 kg1520 kgJeep −104 kg
Boot360 l355 lAbarth +5 l
Length4189 mm4084 mmAbarth +105 mm
Width1808 mm1776 mmAbarth +32 mm
Height1505 mm1527 mmJeep +22 mm
Wheelbase2560 mm2562 mmJeep +2 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Abarth 600e

Cost per 100 km5.4
Monthly67
Yearly810

Jeep Avenger

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Abarth 600e

Jeep Avenger

Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Abarth 600e or Jeep Avenger?

The Jeep Avenger goes further: 400 km WLTP against the 334 km of the Abarth 600e. That is a difference of 66 km.

Which is more powerful — Abarth 600e or Jeep Avenger?

The Abarth 600e is stronger: 240 PS against the 156 PS of the Jeep Avenger. The gap is 84 PS.

Which charges faster?

The Abarth 600e accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Jeep Avenger up to 100 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Jeep Avenger uses less electricity: 15.5 kWh/100 km against 18 kWh/100 km in the Abarth 600e. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 375 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.