Abarth 600e vs Citroën ë-C3 Aircross
Biggest differences: Power — Abarth 600e 240 PS, Citroën ë-C3 Aircross 113 PS · 0–100 km/h — Abarth 600e 6.24 s, Citroën ë-C3 Aircross 11 s · Top speed — Abarth 600e 200 km/h, Citroën ë-C3 Aircross 132 km/h.
Abarth 600e
The Abarth 600e is a compact electric crossover with front-wheel drive, offering two power options and a WLTP range of 334 kilometers.
Citroën ë-C3 Aircross
The Citroën ë-C3 Aircross is an electric SUV in the B segment, offering two battery options with different WLTP ranges.
Profile against the market: Abarth 600e vs Citroën ë-C3 Aircross
Abarth 600eTurismo
Citroën ë-C3 Aircross54 kWh Extended Range
Abarth 600e or Citroën ë-C3 Aircross — who wins where
Citroën ë-C3 Aircross leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmCitroën ë-C3 Aircross +67 km
- Battery kWhCitroën ë-C3 Aircross +3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmCitroën ë-C3 Aircross −2.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAbarth 600e +127 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAbarth 600e −4.8 s
- Top speed km/hAbarth 600e +68 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minCitroën ë-C3 Aircross −1 min
- Weight ↓ kgCitroën ë-C3 Aircross −93 kg
- Boot lCitroën ë-C3 Aircross +100 l
Technical data: Abarth 600e vs Citroën ë-C3 Aircross
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Abarth 600e Turismo | Citroën ë-C3 Aircross 54 kWh Extended Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 334 km | 401 km | Citroën +67 km |
| Battery | 51 kWh | 54 kWh | Citroën +3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18 kWh/100 km | 15.7 kWh/100 km | Citroën −2.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 20–80% ↓ | 27 min | 26 min | Citroën −1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 7.4 km/min | 9.3 km/min | Citroën +1.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 240 PS | 113 PS | Abarth +127 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.24 s | 11 s | Abarth −4.8 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 132 km/h | Abarth +68 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1624 kg | 1531 kg | Citroën −93 kg |
| Boot | 360 l | 460 l | Citroën +100 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Citroën |
| Length | 4189 mm | 4395 mm | Citroën +206 mm |
| Width | 1808 mm | 1795 mm | Abarth +13 mm |
| Height | 1505 mm | 1660 mm | Citroën +155 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2560 mm | 2671 mm | Citroën +111 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Abarth 600e
Citroën ë-C3 Aircross
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Abarth 600e
Citroën ë-C3 Aircross
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Abarth 600e or Citroën ë-C3 Aircross?
The Citroën ë-C3 Aircross goes further: 401 km WLTP against the 334 km of the Abarth 600e. That is a difference of 67 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Citroën ë-C3 Aircross — its 54 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Abarth 600e, with 51 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Abarth 600e or Citroën ë-C3 Aircross?
The Abarth 600e is stronger: 240 PS against the 113 PS of the Citroën ë-C3 Aircross. The gap is 127 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Citroën ë-C3 Aircross takes more: 460 l against 360 l in the Abarth 600e. The difference is 100 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.