Abarth 600e vs Volvo EX30

Biggest differences: DC charging — Abarth 600e 100 kW, Volvo EX30 175 kW · WLTP range — Abarth 600e 334 km, Volvo EX30 475 km · Battery — Abarth 600e 51 kWh, Volvo EX30 69 kWh.

Abarth 600e

The Abarth 600e is a compact electric crossover with front-wheel drive, offering two power options and a WLTP range of 334 kilometers.

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering a wide range of powertrain configurations with varying ranges and performance levels.

Profile against the market: Abarth 600e vs Volvo EX30

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Abarth 600e or Volvo EX30 — who wins where

Volvo EX30 leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmVolvo EX30 +141 km
    Abarth 600e
    334
    Volvo EX30
    475
  • Battery kWhVolvo EX30 +18 kWh
    Abarth 600e
    51
    Volvo EX30
    69
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmVolvo EX30 −1 kWh/100 km
    Abarth 600e
    18
    Volvo EX30
    17
  • Power PSVolvo EX30 +32 PS
    Abarth 600e
    240
    Volvo EX30
    272
  • 0–100 km/h sVolvo EX30 −0.9 s
    Abarth 600e
    6.24
    Volvo EX30
    5.3
  • Top speed km/hAbarth 600e +20 km/h
    Abarth 600e
    200
    Volvo EX30
    180
  • DC charging kWVolvo EX30 +75 kW
    Abarth 600e
    100
    Volvo EX30
    175
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Abarth 600e
    11
    Volvo EX30
    11
  • Weight kgAbarth 600e −151 kg
    Abarth 600e
    1624
    Volvo EX30
    1775
  • Boot lAbarth 600e +42 l
    Abarth 600e
    360
    Volvo EX30
    318

Add a third car

Technical data: Abarth 600e vs Volvo EX30

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Abarth 600e vs Volvo EX30
Key parameters Abarth 600e
Turismo
Volvo EX30
P5 Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range334 km475 kmVolvo +141 km
Battery51 kWh69 kWhVolvo +18 kWh
Consumption18 kWh/100 km17 kWh/100 kmVolvo −1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW175 kWVolvo +75 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 27 min 20–80%27 min 10–80%No difference
Range per minute of charging7.4 km/min12.3 km/minVolvo +4.9 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power240 PS272 PSVolvo +32 PS
0–100 km/h6.24 s5.3 sVolvo −0.9 s
Top speed200 km/h180 km/hAbarth +20 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1624 kg1775 kgAbarth −151 kg
Boot360 l318 lAbarth +42 l
Length4189 mm4233 mmVolvo +44 mm
Width1808 mm1837 mmVolvo +29 mm
Height1505 mm1549 mmVolvo +44 mm
Wheelbase2560 mm2650 mmVolvo +90 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Abarth 600e

Cost per 100 km5.4
Monthly67
Yearly810

Volvo EX30

Cost per 100 km5.1
Monthly64
Yearly765

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Abarth 600e

Volvo EX30

Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Abarth 600e or Volvo EX30?

The Volvo EX30 goes further: 475 km WLTP against the 334 km of the Abarth 600e. That is a difference of 141 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Abarth 600e and the Volvo EX30 differ?

The Abarth 600e has FWD and 240 PS. The Volvo EX30 has RWD and 272 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Abarth 600e takes more: 360 l against 318 l in the Volvo EX30. The difference is 42 l.

Which charges faster?

The Abarth 600e accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Volvo EX30 up to 175 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.