Polestar 2 vs Togg T10F
Biggest differences: Power — Polestar 2 299 PS, Togg T10F 218 PS · Boot — Polestar 2 405 l, Togg T10F 505 l · 0–100 km/h — Polestar 2 6.2 s, Togg T10F 7.5 s.
Polestar 2
The Polestar 2 is a sedan (segment D) that offers both single-motor rear-wheel drive and dual-motor all-wheel drive options, with a range exceeding 590 kilometers.
Togg T10F
The Togg T10F is a D-segment sedan offering rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive variants, with power ranging from 218 to 435 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Polestar 2 vs Togg T10F
Polestar 2Long Range Single Motor
Togg T10FV1 RWD Long Range
Polestar 2 or Togg T10F — who wins where
Polestar 2 leads 7 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPolestar 2 +49 km
- Battery kWhTogg T10F +6.5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmPolestar 2 −2.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPolestar 2 +81 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sPolestar 2 −1.3 s
- Top speed km/hPolestar 2 +33 km/h
- DC charging kWPolestar 2 +25 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgPolestar 2 −145 kg
- Boot lTogg T10F +100 l
Technical data: Polestar 2 vs Togg T10F
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Polestar 2 Long Range Single Motor | Togg T10F V1 RWD Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 659 km | 610 km | Polestar +49 km |
| Battery | 82 kWh | 88.5 kWh | Togg +6.5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.8 kWh/100 km | 17.4 kWh/100 km | Polestar −2.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 205 kW | 180 kW | Polestar +25 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 28 min 10–80% | 28 min 20–80% | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 16.5 km/min | 13.1 km/min | Polestar +3.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 299 PS | 218 PS | Polestar +81 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.2 s | 7.5 s | Polestar −1.3 s |
| Top speed | 205 km/h | 172 km/h | Polestar +33 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1934 kg | 2079 kg | Polestar −145 kg |
| Boot | 405 l | 505 l | Togg +100 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Togg |
| Length | 4606 mm | 4830 mm | Togg +224 mm |
| Width | 1859 mm | 1881 mm | Togg +22 mm |
| Height | 1479 mm | 1553 mm | Togg +74 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2735 mm | 2890 mm | Togg +155 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Polestar 2
Togg T10F
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Polestar 2
Togg T10F
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Polestar 2 or Togg T10F?
The Polestar 2 goes further: 659 km WLTP against the 610 km of the Togg T10F. That is a difference of 49 km.
Why does the Togg T10F have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Polestar 2?
The Togg T10F carries 88.5 kWh and covers 610 km, while the Polestar 2 with its 82 kWh battery does 659 km. Energy use decides it: 17.4 against 14.8 kWh/100 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Togg T10F — its 88.5 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Polestar 2, with 82 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Polestar 2 or Togg T10F?
The Polestar 2 is stronger: 299 PS against the 218 PS of the Togg T10F. The gap is 81 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.