Nissan Townstar EV Passenger vs Peugeot E-Rifter
Biggest differences: DC charging — Nissan Townstar EV Passenger 80 kW, Peugeot E-Rifter 100 kW · WLTP range — Nissan Townstar EV Passenger 285 km, Peugeot E-Rifter 339 km · Power — Nissan Townstar EV Passenger 122 PS, Peugeot E-Rifter 136 PS.
Nissan Townstar EV Passenger
The Nissan Townstar EV Passenger is a compact, C-segment van with an electric powertrain and seating configurations for up to 7 passengers.
Peugeot E-Rifter
The Peugeot E-Rifter is a compact van with front-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of up to 339 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Nissan Townstar EV Passenger vs Peugeot E-Rifter
Nissan Townstar EV PassengerTownstar EV Passenger L1 (5-seat)
Peugeot E-Rifter50 kWh
Nissan Townstar EV Passenger or Peugeot E-Rifter — who wins where
Peugeot E-Rifter leads 7 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot E-Rifter +54 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot E-Rifter +1.3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmPeugeot E-Rifter −1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPeugeot E-Rifter +14 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sPeugeot E-Rifter −1.1 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWPeugeot E-Rifter +20 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgPeugeot E-Rifter −40 kg
- Boot lNissan Townstar EV Passenger +75 l
Technical data: Nissan Townstar EV Passenger vs Peugeot E-Rifter
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Nissan Townstar EV PassengerTownstar EV Passenger L1 (5-seat) | 50 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 285 km | 339 km | Peugeot +54 km |
| Battery | 45 kWh | 46.3 kWh | Peugeot +1.3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 19.3 kWh/100 km | 18.3 kWh/100 km | Peugeot −1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 80 kW | 100 kW | Peugeot +20 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 37 min 15–80% | 30 min 0–80% | 7 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 5 km/min | 9 km/min | Peugeot +4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 122 PS | 136 PS | Peugeot +14 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 12.6 s | 11.5 s | Peugeot −1.1 s |
| Top speed | 132 km/h | 132 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1795 kg | 1755 kg | Peugeot −40 kg |
| Boot | 850 l | 775 l | Nissan +75 l |
| Length | 4488 mm | 4405 mm | Nissan +83 mm |
| Width | 1860 mm | 1848 mm | Nissan +12 mm |
| Height | 1838 mm | 1818 mm | Nissan +20 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2716 mm | 2785 mm | Peugeot +69 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Nissan Townstar EV Passenger
Peugeot E-Rifter
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Nissan Townstar EV Passenger
Peugeot E-Rifter
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment C
Nissan Townstar EV Passengervs
Ford e-Tourneo Courier
Nissan Townstar EV Passengervs
Kia PV5
Nissan Townstar EV Passengervs
Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric
Toyota Proace City Verso
Citroën ë-Berlingo
Kia PV5
Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech ElectricFrequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Nissan Townstar EV Passenger or Peugeot E-Rifter?
The Peugeot E-Rifter goes further: 339 km WLTP against the 285 km of the Nissan Townstar EV Passenger. That is a difference of 54 km.
Which charges faster?
The Nissan Townstar EV Passenger accepts up to 80 kW DC, the Peugeot E-Rifter up to 100 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Peugeot E-Rifter uses less electricity: 18.3 kWh/100 km against 19.3 kWh/100 km in the Nissan Townstar EV Passenger. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 150 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.